BobTurbo

5 ms·

1.
by BobTurbo 13y ago
I would like to point out that I am actually the creator of this idea, and not the author. The author has created a variation in C#, that has some differences. The original repository is at: https://github.com/thebinarysearc
2.
Meet RegExpBuilder: Verbal Expressions’ rich, older cousin(thechangelog.com)
1 points by BobTurbo 13y ago|0 comments
3.
RegExpBuilder: because regular expressions suck(github.com)
2 points by BobTurbo 13y ago|3 comments
4.
RegExpBuilder.js: readable, maintainable, and dynamic regular expressions(github.com)
1 points by BobTurbo 13y ago|0 comments
5.
Show HN: RegExpBuilder.js(github.com)
2 points by BobTurbo 13y ago|0 comments
6.
Show HN: RegExpBuilder.js(github.com)
1 points by BobTurbo 13y ago|0 comments
7.
Show HN: RegExpBuilder.js(github.com)
1 points by BobTurbo 13y ago|0 comments
8.
by BobTurbo 15y ago
How do you know that they're not censoring edits to make articles reflect more positively on a company with which they have a donating relationship?
9.
by BobTurbo 15y ago
Yes if you write it like that, it removes one of my complaints, but it leaves the other. You now have inconsistency in the language because LINQ is basically being used as a new type of language added to an existing language. You are workin
10.
by BobTurbo 15y ago
var saltGrains = new List<Salt>(); foreach (var g in grains) { if (g.TypeOf() == "Salt" && g.Value == nothing) saltGrains.Add(g); } saltGrains.sort(m => m.Value.irellevance); return saltGrains.First();
11.
by BobTurbo 15y ago
Yes, it requires a wide-screen monitor. I don't think I can answer the other question as I don't see any value in it. Turning loops and so on into a giant, inflexible (unless you want two wide-screen monitors) daisy-chain of methods does no
12.
by BobTurbo 15y ago
I have little knowledge of the latest trends in programming languages, but if your example of a good PL theorist is someone who designed LINQ, then I am going to have to take your opinion with a grain.OfType(Salt).Where(m => m.Value.Con
13.
by BobTurbo 15y ago
The devices are fast enough, but with that speed came massive battery life problems. Therefore, the same problem exists, its effects have just moved somewhere else. It is therefore not comparable with the desktop.
14.
by BobTurbo 15y ago
google+ is dead. Google doesn't have the talent.