BobNNN

5 ms·

1.
by BobNNN 11y ago
"Finally, ad hominem arguments are fallacious on their face, and tiresome." And where do you see one in my comment? You're just flailing. You spend too much time on the intertubes and think what you're doing is discussi
2.
by BobNNN 11y ago
To be frank, until this little exchange, I thought you were unfairly treated in the storm surrounding your contribution. I thought social media was mostly to blame and that a lot of folks treated you badly, mostly for their own publicity p
3.
by BobNNN 11y ago
There was no conjugal definition in law until anti-SSM people put one there. All over the world for millennia. In 372, the first Christian emperors of Rome banned SSM and tens of thousands of people across the Empire were led to their deat
4.
by BobNNN 11y ago
What animus? You contributed to Prop 8 when it was a campaign issue. Nothing in Prop 8 protected the thousands marriages that existed at the time of the vote. The plain language of Prop 8 would have rendered those marriages meaningless.
5.
by BobNNN 11y ago
So why don't you folks fight for changes in the law to only convey the benefits of marriage to couples with children? Surely you'd include gay couples in that if you did, right?
6.
by BobNNN 11y ago
You say marriage was defined as man/woman by pointing to Prop 22 that specifically defined as such in order to prevent same-sex couples from marrying? And that's you're proof that your position has nothing to do with anti-gay
7.
by BobNNN 11y ago
You continue to evade the fact that, yes, you contributed money to a campaign to remove the right of marriage and to dissolve the marriages of thousands of Californians. You contributed to a campaign that demonized gay people as a threat t