Bjartr

16 ms·

271.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Only because the Overton window has shifted enough to normalize it.
272.
by Bjartr 2y ago
But that's incorrect, we can go back to the moon any time, there just hasn't been a strong enough incentive to really make the cost worth it for either science or commerce until recently.
273.
by Bjartr 2y ago
> unhinged or a lunatic, but rather cunning and deceptive These aren't mutually exclusive.
274.
by Bjartr 2y ago
The Flux Keyboard should begin shipping this year. https://fluxkeyboard.com/
275.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Knowing what constitutes "minimum viable" takes experience.
276.
by Bjartr 2y ago
It's probably enough to leave a comment on the page if the author is active on itch
277.
by Bjartr 2y ago
The best libraries provide both the abstractions and the building blocks those abstractions were built from so consumers can benefit from the abstraction when they can, but aren't blocked just because the library devs didn't consi
278.
by Bjartr 2y ago
> asking it to fix it again works just well enough. I've yet to encounter any LLM from chatGPT to cursor, that doesn't choke and start to repeat itself and say it changed code when it didn't, or get stuck changing somethin
279.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Seems like even a rudimentary ML model powering ad placements would run afoul of this.
280.
by Bjartr 2y ago
> How to Win Friends and influence People Such a good book, I'm about due for a re-read I think.
281.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Do you mind explaining why this was problematic? I'm working to track down things that I say that might be interpreted in ways other than I intend, and this sounds like a mistake I would make. What's the problematic message that&#
282.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Yep, and we could have gotten there with a lot fewer people being hurt in the process.
283.
by Bjartr 2y ago
It's not like we rolled dice to get the spending we had. Decisions were made based on information available. There are detailed explanations available for all sorts of spending. Refusing to seek that out isn't the same as it not e
284.
by Bjartr 2y ago
These are questions with long standing answers arrived at iteratively over decades. Should those answers continue to be questioned and iterated upon? Absolutely. Is throwing the baby out with the bathwater all at once while crying "tax
285.
by Bjartr 2y ago
I've been a fan of The Little Learner for the first principles side of things. It builds up the theory from almost nothing, step by step. It's got a conversational style that may turn some off, but I quite enjoyed it. https:&#x2F
286.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Yeah, screw anyone we can throw into some "other" bucket. I got mine and that's all that could ever matter. /s
287.
by Bjartr 2y ago
It's definitely not just on the internet, I've been working for years to learn how to not upset people for asking reasonable and genuine questions IRL. It's a real struggle to this day to notice I'm failing to engage in
288.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Not every question is a criticism that needs to be defended against. The person you're responding to could very well just like to know the reason if one exists, no more, no less. If you know a better way to get that info than asking th
289.
by Bjartr 2y ago
This is often framed in api design as make it easy to use it correctly and difficult to use it incorrectly.
290.
by Bjartr 2y ago
The backend repo, but I'll chalk that up to not realizing I was only seeing pinned repos for your organization on github mobile.
291.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Thanks! I missed that.
292.
by Bjartr 2y ago
As far as I can tell looking around the repo, An open source frontend for a proprietary AI meeting copilot Did I miss something?
293.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Given how laws and American rights have been established to work. Yes, absolutely. They just need a legally acceptable reason to do so separate from the speech. Banning a platform because of speech they don't want isn't allowed, b
294.
by Bjartr 2y ago
That indirectness is exactly why it's not. The first amendment ensures you can express what you want, but you're not owed a platform.
295.
by Bjartr 2y ago
> The idea that the CCP could drive our national conversation somehow (still murky) bothers me. Even if all the CCP can do is modify how often some videos and comments show up to users on tik tok, there's a chance that level of cont
296.
by Bjartr 2y ago
If that's true, that might also be part of why dreams exist. If the glymphatic cleanout during sleep is a rhythmic constriction wave across the brain, then whatever the brain is doing at the time the wave crosses it becomes a sustained
297.
by Bjartr 2y ago
> So the distinction is moot. From the perspective of an applicant's emotional response, sure, but it's absolutely relevant in order to have a conversation about how to solve it since the different causes may need different app
298.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Spent a few minutes trying to find an answer to "why do this?" Beyond just implying that it should be done and the most I was able to find was one sentence buried amongst paragraphs and paragraphs of "what" and "how
299.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Talking to a lawyer is not "stopping everything", it's an hour or two of time and maybe a couple hundred dollars. Not nothing, sure, but not something that should be an obstacle for most here.
300.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Oh, I see where I misunderstood. I agree there doesn't appear to be a built in way to check, given a label, that the label is legit. However, I was able to at least verify the label on my dishwasher by doing a google search for `site:e

More ›