3 ms·
Seems like even a rudimentary ML model powering ad placements would run afoul of this.
by Bjartr 2y ago
Seems like even a rudimentary ML model powering ad placements would run afoul of this.
- dijksterhuis 2y ago> In addition, common and legitimate commercial practices, for example in the field of advertising, that comply with the applicable law should not, in themselves, be regarded as constituting harmful manipulative AI-enabled practices. https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/recital/29/ https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/recital/29/
- Ajedi32 2y agoBroadly speaking, I feel whenever you have to build into a law specific cave outs for perfectly innocuous behavior that would otherwise be illegal under the law as written, it's not a very well thought out law. Either the behavior in question is actually bad in which case there shouldn't be exceptions, or there's actually nothing inherently wrong with it in which case you have misidentified the actual problem and are probably needlessly criminalizing a huge swathe of normal behavior beyond just the one exception you happened to think of.
- HPsquared 2y agoIt's the style of law that says "Anything not explicitly permitted, is banned."
- bmicraft 2y agoFunny, I took away pretty much the opposite. That advertising is only "acceptable" because it been here for too long, but is otherwise equally ban-worthy for all the same (reasonable) reasons.
- campl3r 2y agoWe, as society, allow legacy implementations to exist all the time. This is one of these times.
- anticensor 2y agoThat is by design.
- blackeyeblitzar 2y agoEven ads without ML would run afoul of this
- kavalg 2y agoThe burden will be on proving "significant harm"