Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
BenoitP
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
241.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
The lines were not operating, but now the law prevents them from being reopened. It's like a one-way valve, and IMHO a good way to go about domestic companies that are still subject to international competition.
242.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
In my part of the world there's this saying: "it takes 10 000 pizzaiolos to make a football player" I guess influencing is the new football.
243.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Alternatively it also means Intel's management isn't inspired enough to make use of human and physical assets. As an investor, I'd take it as sign that they think they're done, packing up assets and becoming a lower size
244.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
If this isn't the sign that Intel has no inspiration to invest and profit on their assets I don't know what is.
245.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
SEEKING WORK | Paris, France | Remote-open --------------------------- Machine learning engineer, specialized in Explainable AI / ML. 13 years professional coding experience, 24 years personal. Recent highlights: * Seamless integration
246.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Machine learning engineer, specialized in Explainable AI / ML. 13 years professional coding experience, 24 years personal. Recent Highlights: * Seamless integration of hand-crafted rules with ML-build rules * Intuitive, visual data
247.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
To be taken with a grain of salt: this guy has one of the most active troll farm. He knows what he's doing.
248.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
One thing sustainability, fashion and denim: we could start by not artificially preusing it. Also: is it me or about 20 years ago a pair of jeans lasted way longer than they currently do? Maybe thinner materials were introduced for softness
249.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
TL;DR: No Some physics: raising 1kg of water by 1k takes 4184 J. Evaporating 1kg of water takes 2260 kJ. Notice the k in kJ. That's 500x better. Regulation has changed, and you can no longer cool down a react by heating river water. Yo
250.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Damn, poor launchpad ^^
251.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
There is another official one, slightly ahead: https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/1649033533846097927?s=20
252.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Apparently it came back on the frontpage
253.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
T-80: SpaceX "Fueling of Starship’s upper stage is now underway" T-86: SpaceX "Fueling of the Super Heavy booster is underway" T-117: SpaceX "The Starship team is go for prop load; team is keeping an eye on the weat
254.
▲
SpaceX Launches Starship Flight Test
(youtube.com)
5 points
by
BenoitP
3y ago
|
7 comments
255.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Posting NASASpaceflight's channel as previous thread with the official feed fell off the front-page (maybe too much comments vs upvotes early on?) Older thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35637882
256.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Can't edit this comment anymore nor delete it, as it is too old (threshold at ~2h30 apparently). Please let it sink / downvote it
257.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Video analysis: * Parts of launch platform going up in the air. * Rocket drifting laterally wrt to the launch tower. * Part of hydraulic system blowing up with an engine at T+30 * T+50: fire on the left of the rocket engines * T+1m05: somet
258.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
(French): https://www.twitch.tv/hugolisoir Though I bet that if youtube is blocked at your workplace, so is twitch.
259.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Copying analysis/speculation from the reddit thread: - in the morning so they've got the maximum amount of daylight to deal with any possible outcome - 62mn max window duration is the limit for acceptable propellant boil off
260.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
$10/kg to LEO is insane
261.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Edited!
262.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
T-8h: EM "All systems currently green for launch" ---- Launch in about 3 hours (13:28 UTC), which would be: - 6:28 Pacific - 7:28 Mountain - 8:28 Central - 9:28 Eastern - 15:28 European - Other: https://www.timeanddate.
263.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
For all the RSS readers coming late: launch got scrubbed! Next attempt on same window on the 20th, that is: Apr 20 2023, 13:28 UTC (Youtube video feed opening about 45mn before that) Lots of other info here: https://old.reddit.co
264.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
I wouldn't say there is a lot of excess fuel as a percentage of the mix in exhaust gases, but there is some, by design. Maybe a few percents. Why do we want some fuel in the exhaust? Burning an oxydizer-rich mix is not a good idea, es
265.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Scrub reason (from Elon's twitter): "A pressurant valve appears to be frozen, so unless it starts operating soon, no launch today" T-2: New launch attempt in min 48h T-8: Launch scrubbed (pressurization issue), still proceedi
266.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
You know what works just like the Red Hat model, but yields way better returns? The AWS model. Just take all these tech-tested market-tested open source projects, slap on a new name and bill them by the hour.
267.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Small data is better handled by greedy methods. XGBoost is still the go to in tabular Kaggle challenges.
268.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Kotlin's are stackless (as in emulated by the compiler), Java's are stackful (as in a chunk of stack is copied into the heap along with a program resume point) This means Kotlin's functions can become colored [1] which is a p
269.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
Your second link is from 2018, and would indeed need a case study for Loom. For example the concerns about thread-local storage are addressed, and the base overhead is understood (as in: don't use them for CPU-bound worloads, they'
270.
▲
by
BenoitP
3y ago
IMHO virtual is the perfect word. The JVM's entire schtick is abstracting (virtual) hardware (machine). A simple API pertaining to intent, that can be materialized depending on OS and hardware. Calls are virtual, though under the hood
More ›