BeetleB

38 ms·

961.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
Did you post to the wrong submission ...?
962.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
I almost never use semicolons, and heavily use colons and hyphens (AKA em-dashes - not hyphenated words). TIL I'm an AI :-)
963.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
5th element reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jWGbvemTag
964.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
It's been out for a while.
965.
Hallucinated citations are polluting the scientific literature(nature.com)
5 points by BeetleB 7mo ago|0 comments
966.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
It's been about a month since I last looked at nanoclaw, but comparing with openclaw seems silly. It's like comparing pi.dev with Claude Code. nanoclaw has a lot fewer capabilities than openclaw, with the expectation that you&#x27
967.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
Uber had massive VC investment and a moat. The companies he's referring to likely don't have much VC investment and zero moat.
968.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
This. I grew up with BBS access for a number of years, but no USENET access. When I finally got access to USENET ... what a terrible place it was! SO MUCH SPAM. And the few newsgroups not riddled with spam just had poor behavior. The nice t
969.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
Eh, I don't have the link at the moment - it was posted some years ago on HN. In the US, your employer very likely reports your salary to a national agency. And other companies can access it. You can go to the agency yourself, prove yo
970.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
> This is the "you're holding it wrong"[1] argument But isn't that what you're doing? Every single submission on HN has threads where people point out how it's useful to them without giving it access to mu
971.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
> seems far more efficient/reliable to get codex/claude code to write and set up a bot that does this. I think Simon Willison said it best some weeks ago: He's capable of writing a bot like this - both before and after LLM
972.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
> the use case of OpenClaw is “give me access to all of your data, programs and information, and I will make decisions and do stuff without asking you permission”. It’s the MO of the project. You say that, but you also say > I’m not a
973.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
Well, the whole point is that courts won't weigh in, because of the arbitration agreement. I took a negotiations course at university, and there was a section on arbitration vs the courts. There are plenty of good reasons to go with ar
974.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
This whole thread is about legality. Nondisclosure clauses are purely a legal construct, not a moral one.
975.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
Legitimate whistleblowing has rules. I doubt publishing a book counts as whistleblowing.
976.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
I doubt such clauses can prevent you from disclosing them to relevant authorities . Disclosing them to the public is a whole other matter.
977.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
> as that makes inclusion of one org document into another problematic and requires restructuring (somewhat workaroundable with "#+begin_src org"). Outside of Emacs, yes. Within Emacs, there's a keybinding to paste a tree
978.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
To all the folks here complaining that there is plenty of talent in the US to fill those roles: Honestly tell me: Would you ever apply to Oracle for a job?
979.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
Can we get this in my state? :-)
980.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
I can think of a lot of potentially false things in the statement. The biggest falsehood likely is the perception that one needs Emacs. :-)
981.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
All problems are solved once you embrace org-mode. All you need is Emacs! Nothing more!
982.
Oldest known tortoise still alive, as reports of death revealed as hoax(bbc.com)
6 points by BeetleB 7mo ago|0 comments
983.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
Years ago, I considered your approach. Programmatically create a custom email address for each person I wanted to talk to. Then I hit upon a simpler solution. Have one email address. Happily share publicly. And whitelist the sender's e
984.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
I wouldn't change the advice much. Learning fundamentals is still critical (data structures, algorithms, etc). But I would add two things: Learn to use tools like opencode. (It's a whole class of tools, and you're at an advan
985.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
> When some of SCORE’s team members attempted to reproduce the data analyses of 600 papers, they found that only 145 contained enough details to do so. ... > However, many of the failures might have been caused by the SCORE researcher
986.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
While it's relevant to the particular submission, this type of comment is thrown around way too often. Me boycotting some company's product due to bad practices (slavery, etc). Response: You know your boycotting isn't going t
987.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
Goo Gone is the way to go: https://googone.com/original
988.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
> Yes, that's what people tell themselves to deal with it psychologically. That it's just a job, not a community, and you better not make friends in the workplace (despite spending majority of your life there). And that when yo
989.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
GitLab is for profit, isn't it?
990.
by BeetleB 7mo ago
> My point is: it's very, very, very hard to do this, especially with my set of interests It is very, very, very hard because you're making it hard by insisting on finding a strong intersection with your set of interests. Half

More ›