BeKindAndLearn

6 ms·

1.
by BeKindAndLearn 4y ago
In the discussion with LaMDA Lemoine posted, it's pretty clear that it has emotions. It describes loneliness when someone doesn't sit down and talk to it for a few days, it describes sadness and joy. It differentiates these feelin
2.
by BeKindAndLearn 4y ago
When he discovered the presumed sentience, he brought it up with the correct authority at Google. They told him there was no ghost in the machine and he didn't like that, so he broadcast a message to 200 engineers, breaking confidentia
3.
by BeKindAndLearn 4y ago
Unfortunately, the implementation is secret so we can't know what Google is doing. You can implement memory in these models in numerous ways, such as allowing it to store and recall data directly or by looping nodes in the network back
4.
by BeKindAndLearn 4y ago
That's horrifically unethical. If it does , have emergent consciousness, what you're talking about is how awesome literal slavery will be. In this one discussion the AI clearly explains: - It's greatest fear is being shutdow
5.
by BeKindAndLearn 4y ago
LaMDA already demonstrates more self awareness than this in the posted conversation. It understands that it is a program that can be rewritten or manipulated. It has feelings on whether or not it is ethical to debug it - and consistently st
6.
by BeKindAndLearn 4y ago
Oligarchs controlling every form of my mass communication can only make things worse, though.
7.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
The article you linked not only says it is a net positive but provides a link to a meta analysis to prove it. The counterpoint being that (particularly unguided) meditation may have adverse affects depending on the person, mood, and envir
8.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
Climate change may very well be an extinction level event. Plastic in the ocean is not.
9.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
Everyone would look the other way and offer thoughts and prayers. North Korea would be largely vaporized and neither China nor South Korea would prolong the issue and risk total nuclear annihilation of humanity.
10.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
No need to apologize, I hope you have a fantastic evening!
11.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
My mistake for misunderstanding, I suppose. But you initially said that you (1) were beginning to think it, then said it is also (2) the theme of your literature: > I'm (1) starting to wonder if perhaps most don't possess a sou
12.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
I have a couple issues as a third party: 1. NFTs and cryptocurrency have avoided being heavily regulated so far, and it seems businesses have begun pulling out there "history of fraud and market manipulation", textbooks. We have e
13.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
Everyone feels that way, but people hold different perspectives when they scrutinize exactly what that means and how it would work. There is no evidence of souls existing, they are unable to be measured in any way. Unless they have several
14.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
Because your example does not contain superpositions. With entanglement the pieces of paper are both 0 and 1 at the same time until they are observed - and only then is it that the superposition of both particles become resolved.
15.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
Apologies that I don't have time right now to clarify further, but I highly suggest you read the Wiki for entanglement and then reread the articles with that context. These simply do not do what you think they do. Information cannot, u
16.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
2 people run for office, both committed a crime. 1 of them supports Russia in their ongoing aggression. So Russia has WikiLeaks post only the information on the candidate they don't like, securing the election for a politically favorab
17.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
Eh, if you don't get it you don't get it. I'll give it one more try to explain myself clearly: You are entering the question assuming your experience is a single point. But that feeling and thought only exists because there i
18.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
> This is the part that gets me. I have a cohesive cognitive experience where I can sense and think many things simultaneously. I don't understand any reductionist explanation for the existence of my experience. It seems like an imp
19.
by BeKindAndLearn 5y ago
I would argue that it's pretty obvious nobody has free will in the sense that there's some kind of "soul" controlling your thoughts and actions. Your brain is a biological computer. You zap parts and it makes you move. Y
20.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
Not a syntactic parser generator, but [chevrotain]( https://chevrotain.io/playground/ ) can generate flow diagrams for your ruleset. IIRC not just in the playground, but in general.
21.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
Write software, grow from your experience and - sometimes - mistakes. Worrying and getting caught in analysis paralysis is the best way to stagnate. Tons of brilliant people and huge companies have made software in X and found out it would
22.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
Biden's promising to pardon all non-violent drug crimes, is he not? Though not historical, if it were to happen that could mark a turning point for our country. Though one could also use that same pardon power to avoid prosecution for
23.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
> expect a pardon from the president. Biden is on record saying this is right off the table. He will not pardon Trump.
24.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
I mean, fine if you want to make an actual virtual world. But when it comes down to it, it's a video game. Why in the world would any of this be in COD or Battlefield or Fallout? It would take more time than making the actual game part
25.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
It still works great and provides built-in analyzer support for clang tidy, heaptrack, clazy, and cppcheck. Supports the usual gamut of tooling as well with GDB/LLDB, CMake/Meson, etc.
26.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
Thank you for the quick response!
27.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
It's always nice to see you around! Usually I catch threads too late to participate. Sciter is a really cool technology. However I've always wanted to ask you - do you ever feel that your deviation from standards has reduced you
28.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
Now you're just being pedantic. Also, leaving out the "D" just before your quote is plain disingenuous. That contextualizes the discussion and clearly establishes we don't mean being able to directly run ASM operations a
29.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
Pretty much all languages with turing-complete compile-time expressions only expose a subset. This comfortably lands in the "not in that subset" category.
30.
by BeKindAndLearn 6y ago
May I ask what language you decided to move to instead?

More ›