Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Bantros
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
Bantros
5y ago
It's just I'm not gonna take it is all
2.
▲
by
Bantros
5y ago
It isn't
3.
▲
by
Bantros
5y ago
Shocker
4.
▲
by
Bantros
5y ago
This. Get these people out of your workplace and away from any position of power before they burn it to the ground
5.
▲
by
Bantros
5y ago
Good
6.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
It isn't
7.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
Oh no, it's offensive. Get a grip
8.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
"And you had people — and I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists — because they should be condemned totally"
9.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
"Or encouraging those "fine people" in Charlottesville who murdered a woman" is divorced from reality, because it didn't happen
10.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
Not heard of half of these but looks like Signal is by far the best alternative
11.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
All of it
12.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
Saying a big protest will be wild is a call for violence now. Psuedo-reality
13.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
Tachyons does it well
14.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
Ah thanks
15.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
Any benefits to switching to ZSH in Catalina? The prompt every time I open the command line is annoying me
16.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
Oh I would not be glad, as he holds a very narrow interpretation of the term "reasonable"
17.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
You've been allowed to leave your home from Day 1 of the lockdown and there is no law to say otherwise Edit: Though under reasonable terms, including exercise and food shopping. If you have only obeying the slogans, which was my point,
18.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
Not sure about you, but I certainly don't take a brightly coloured PR slogan plastered on a Tory government podium as gospel
19.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
So no law was broken, just guidance... maybe. Depending on interpretation
20.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
What law did he break?
21.
▲
by
Bantros
6y ago
He didn't break any law
22.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
Stunning and brave
23.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
It isn't, they don't, nor should they bother trying
24.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
The world we live in
25.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
Keep telling yourself that
26.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
Yawn
27.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
Alright Ted! Joking aside, I tend to agree
28.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
If you suppose methane is "irrelevant" to climate change, like the adviser suggests, that surely implies made-made CO2 contributions are about as relevant. In this case not very, or irrelevant. Definitely doesn't sound as hum
29.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
So about as relevant as man-made CO2 contributions to "climate change" then?
30.
▲
by
Bantros
7y ago
The poster should not ask such silly questions, just trust the science!
More ›