Banana699

11 ms·

31.
by Banana699 4y ago
Ok, but your pressuring is not working. We're just trying to save you from wasting your time.
32.
by Banana699 4y ago
Yes you can, convince your friends to deactivate their social media accounts where\when they're harrassed or aggressively block those who harrass them. Teach them tips and tricks to bully back (bullying is really easy). Find them menta
33.
by Banana699 4y ago
>They (KiwiFarms, Daily Stormer) would be better not on the internet. That's not for you to decide, you're not the manager of the internet.
34.
by Banana699 4y ago
>What are the top 3 things accomplished and implemented by the “extremely powerful” neural networks and machine learning? Off the top of my head and in no particular order : 1- Playing human games at superhuman performance from raw pixel
35.
by Banana699 4y ago
This is as ridiculous as claiming that a neural network is going to make Skynet. First, statistics is not a small branch of math, proability theory is (not a small branch by the way, not by a long shot, just a branch, one of the fundamental
36.
by Banana699 4y ago
My counterexample list is not just myself, that's just the first and most obvious element. There is no point to listing all the people that hate your newfound religion despite being from the 'younger generation', almost every
37.
by Banana699 4y ago
No, I didn't. How does this relate to my comment ?
38.
by Banana699 4y ago
One man's immaturity is another man's "having a spine to stand up for oneself". Spite is awesome, I wish people had more spite in them, without spite you're just a chicken following whatever the nest is crying about
39.
by Banana699 4y ago
If you hadn't already seen it, check out Vsauce's "Why Are Things Creepy" on youtube. Be advised that the thumbnail of the video is creepy though.
40.
by Banana699 4y ago
If your boy Mike, however, had a temper tantrum every time someone called him "Michael", or exerted public pressure on corporate HR and lawmakers to make it illegal to call him "Michael", I would indeed go out of my way
41.
by Banana699 4y ago
As long as they don't impede my own right to free speech? sure, go ahead, delude yourself to your heart's content. Free speech advocates aren't the ones screaming hysterically about "dead naming" and 3rd person pron
42.
by Banana699 4y ago
Enforcing puritan language just makes you the new butt of jokes. You may think you're changing hearts and minds, but all of them are just humouring you like we humour kids having a temper tantrum. Independent minds, the ones that count
43.
by Banana699 4y ago
Is this supposed to be a coherent answer?
44.
by Banana699 4y ago
There is no such thing as "objectively harmful", all harm or good is decided through values, and those values differ. The exact same way you deal with paedophilia, is the way some countries deal with the LGBT. It doesn't have
45.
by Banana699 4y ago
Well, I'm very interested in Free Speech and the immorality of censorship, so I will take this. First, I will point out that almost no government, ever and everywhere, isn't full to the core with corruption and lying, like a decay
46.
by Banana699 4y ago
>censorship is not inherently bad Then why do you get mad when China or the Middle East bans material they find objectionable? They simply have a different definition of what counts as objectionable, that's all, and it's well w
47.
by Banana699 4y ago
Not as funny as when people link to publicly available content in order to demonstrate China is banning it.
48.
by Banana699 4y ago
If your website is a corporation hitting all the legal prerequisites for fairness requirements (size, market share,...), then yes, you must accept my neo Nazi comment. You are allowed to make rules that ban views on other grounds than its c
49.
by Banana699 4y ago
Why does it matter to you that your sexuality is depicted on screen? Sounds like a bizarre thing to worry about. And US studios already has you covered for centuries worth of "representation" heavy film and TV, why is the Chinese
50.
by Banana699 4y ago
Corporations are not people outside of idiotic law speak. They should have no rights to freedom of association once they reach a certain (law-defined) size. Banana699 has the right to block you or otherwise tell you to fuck off from their p
51.
by Banana699 4y ago
First off, opening a comment with "Hello Troll" has to be the most childish and reddit-like way of opening an HN comment I have ever seen. If you think GP is a troll, you can simply not reply, indeed you are practically obligated
52.
by Banana699 4y ago
This is called Common Sense. To the extent that it's right-wing-coded in (and, I believe, only in) USA is only a reflection of how wacko their pseudo-left has gone.
53.
by Banana699 4y ago
I will review your perceptions of HN bubbles. >Entry level Web Developers are getting $200K per year working in FAANG or Big Tech. Non-FANNG are getting $150K anyway. I don't browse job threads much and I don't pay attention to
54.
by Banana699 4y ago
The key to solving the halting problem is realizing that you don't need to solve the halting problem. Problem : Code C has to run in finite time T, Solution : put a call to a watch dog routine at every loop start, at every subroutine s
55.
by Banana699 4y ago
>that's the price you pay for homoiconicity Well no but actually no. Mathematica is homoiconic, and it has tons of special syntax and sugar that all boils down to lists when you quote. Elixir also does this with a ruby-like syntax o
56.
by Banana699 4y ago
Who cares? Assembly is regular*, very much so. There is a single control flow construct, in conditional and unconditional flavors. There is a single language construct, of which the single control flow construct is but a special case. Code
57.
by Banana699 4y ago
State Machines. Objects are supposed to model state machines, each mutating method is a transition event that takes the current state and any number of arguments and transition the state machine to a new state. In very simple words, each ob
58.
by Banana699 4y ago
Free Speech is obvious, doesn't require 200 IQ by a long shot, I regret to inform you it's you who are just a dumbass.
59.
by Banana699 4y ago
The closest thing that I know of is Philip Tetlock, he made a 20-year-long experiment where he asked a variety of "experts" about political events like the fall of the Berlin Wall, and recorded the results.
60.
by Banana699 4y ago
You don't have a meaningful point to see.

More ›