Bae8anoh

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Bae8anoh 11y ago

   I'm not angry, I'm saddened that you are going to destroy the only functioning distributed consensus because you can't see that the ecosystem is already bleeding under the weight.
2. 2.▲
   by Bae8anoh 11y ago

   > For one, I'd be ok with Tor traffic being de-prioritized in an attack since that is commonly where an attack is coming from anyway. The hardcoded list of "bad" peers is effectively worthless (it's already hopeless
3. 3.▲
   by Bae8anoh 11y ago

   There's no insults in my comment, just statements of fact and links to supporting evidence.
4. 4.▲
   by Bae8anoh 11y ago

   Read up on the history of Mike Hearn, he has wanted to fork Bitcoin into his own governance for years, this is just an excuse. In 2011 he was proposing to Satoshi that he should take over the project[0], in 2013 he was trying to pitch the c