Azsy

7 ms·

31.
by Azsy 5y ago
Have i told you about our lord and savior Rust? Anyways, https://github.com/tokio-rs/loom is used by any serious library doing atomic ops/synchronization and it blew me away with how fast it can catch most bugs li
32.
by Azsy 5y ago
This is definitely part of the problem. But the fundamental flaw is the departure from simplicity. The solution is to have a processor that is so simple that it cant do more then what you expect, and building the tools to make the unexpecte
33.
by Azsy 5y ago
The problem with Ivermectin studies is that people will actually review them, so no academic can build a reputation on fraudulent data. Since there is no way to fake thousands of data point, now expensive research studies and clinical tria
34.
by Azsy 5y ago
What ever the pros and cons are here... What the ** does this mean? > Name , Email > Remain updated, we'll email you when it is available. Why do this? Should i read that the format isn't ready? Is there going to be a mailin
35.
by Azsy 5y ago
Not medical condition, but your state of mind. The goal is to sell others the option to change your mind. Everybody keeps getting surprised at how seemingly irrelevant data points can be used to segment/profile people with a shockingly
36.
by Azsy 5y ago
Obviously the top comment is dumb, but please keep on doing this. Nobody is going to be happy if you hire someone who knows rust. > "As a shortcut for filtering out new people and ideas, i will filter them on the most annoying perso
37.
by Azsy 5y ago
Work-obsessed lunatics are like that even without 'unreasonable' amounts of profits. Greed-obsessed lunatics is a different subset ( with overlap ) but play a very different role in societies. Your view of innovation on The Contin
38.
by Azsy 5y ago
They are not similar at all. We know its possible to have a fusion reactor, we would just have to dump enough mass together to build a sun. Hopefully we can make it more cost effective. There isn't a natural phenomena that solves a pro
39.
by Azsy 5y ago
I've always seen it the other way around. We can keep solving the engineering challenges, but the universe might simply not allow us to get a return on investment with every additional qubit.
40.
by Azsy 5y ago
I think you're getting the FOMO the wrong way around. Im pretty sure an average HN reader understands a lot more about NFT then the average NFT owner. Bitcoin was technically interesting. Whatever your stance on all the negatives in th
41.
by Azsy 5y ago
This is awesome, but I got some bad news for this guy: "If 22 students can design and build a vehicle like this in one year, then I’m sure companies could as well." 22 motivated smart people, guided by profs, with likely a lot of
42.
by Azsy 5y ago
Here are a couple of more reasons beside those mentioned: > Internet dopamine is a huge brain-drain > The world is far more complex now, i.e. were having to either clash with older systems/ideas or try updating legacy systems. &g
43.
by Azsy 5y ago
The market you compete in is the market your users imagine you offer similar solutions. Not the market of how you describe yourself. Docker's features usually include "its easier to create and maintain a system". That Nix doe
44.
HN: Please Ban Partial Posts
3 points by Azsy 5y ago|6 comments
45.
by Azsy 5y ago
Nobody here seems to be focused on the specifics of the case. But i think moving on would leave a great opportunity to re-evaluate corporate SE choices. At the very least we can agree its a good thing that the dev was able to fork/re-i
46.
by Azsy 5y ago
At the root is the question: "Do we make it more complex" or "Do we do try it 3 times". The carmakers have been making the wrong call for the past decades. One of their suppliers has eclipsed their impact on society, mar