Aunche

225 ms·

2431.
by Aunche 9y ago
>His entire argument is based in a long-debunked flawed premise. What flawed premise? That men and women are different? For all your insistence that "bio-truths" are wrong, I've never met anyone who actually bothered to ci
2432.
by Aunche 9y ago
Many psychological studies have confirmed psychological differences between men and women. It is not toxic to discuss these findings.
2433.
by Aunche 9y ago
You can't take a critique on hiring personally. For example, Google skips for phone screen interview for new grads of elite schools like Stanford and MIT. If somebody claims that this is a discriminatory practice that lowers the bar fo
2434.
by Aunche 9y ago
It still shouldn't be offensive. If anything, it is more offensive to suggest that wage discrimination is caused by sexism because that's an attack on character. Indeed, a lot of men are hurt by the suggestion that they may be sex
2435.
by Aunche 9y ago
While those are technically quotes, it looks like they're there just for the Medium author to mock them.
2436.
by Aunche 9y ago
It's completely unreasonable to take a critique on hiring practices or a broad statement about demographics personally. I'm not going to take offense to the statement that men tend to be more aggressive than women. Likewise, if so
2437.
by Aunche 9y ago
I'll admit that there are several problems with the Googler's manifesto. However, it's more embarrassing that the Medium writer chooses to attack a strawman instead of addressing the entire point of the manifesto in the first
2438.
by Aunche 10y ago
For what it's worth, I talked to a Snapchat engineer at a job fair, and he told me that Snapchat is trying to focus on new products and features (like Spectacles) more so than trying to monetize their data.