>His entire argument is based in a long-debunked flawed premise. What flawed premise? That men and women are different? For all your insistence that "bio-truth

>His entire argument is based in a long-debunked flawed premise. What flawed premise? That men and women are different? For all your insistence that "bio-truths" are wrong, I've never met anyone who actually bothered to cite any studies that contradict them. >Counter-examples about: look at CS enrollment rates in India for example That actually supports the author's argument. Given India's notorious treatment of women, it would seem counter-intuitive that they're less sexist. An alternative explanation is that people in poorer countries are more desperate, so they'll take a lucrative job at the expense of their preferences. In wealthier countries, women can afford to pursue their passions. > Under those circumstances a competent engineer should take some time to gather evidence and make proper citations to peer-reviewed research The author did make citations (hyperlinks) to most, though not all, of his controversial statements. However, Gizmodo removed them for formatting purposes and possibly to discredit the memo.