Asiasweatworker

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Asiasweatworker 7y ago

   IBV just is a contractor human resource pool. Nothing can change the fact. HW vendors doesn't want to release the part of CPU bootcode directly. The most end-users wont care about the initialization detail but just want a working hardw
2. 2.▲
   by Asiasweatworker 8y ago

   There is unlawful leaked MS-DOS 6.0 source code too.
3. 3.▲
   by Asiasweatworker 8y ago

   So NaCL and PNaCL are not good enough to be comparable with WASM?
4. 4.▲
   by Asiasweatworker 8y ago

   Even most UEFI/BIOS are compiled by MSVC.and MASM. Why to ignore OVMF?
5. 5.▲
   by Asiasweatworker 9y ago

   This make me to recall a website which claimed NIST P256 ECC Curve is unsafe in some respects.
6. 6.▲
   by Asiasweatworker 9y ago

   This petition like a "responsible encryption". A feasible and easier way is just buy a consumer laptop or shipped with non-AMT ME and make ME boot into the recovery mode.
7. 7.▲
   by Asiasweatworker 9y ago

   server ME does not connect to ethernet but BMC do. They may enable something like Secure Boot which requires signing to prevent 3party unauthorized backdoors.