Arthur8

4 ms·

1.
by Arthur8 4y ago
Huh, I had to re-read the article . "But let’s not overlook the key point: continued growth in energy use becomes physically impossible within conceivable timeframes." (conceivable timeframes ~ few 100 years) As far as I understoo
2.
by Arthur8 4y ago
I was not claiming that we can, I wanted to point out that we do not know if we can not. (maybe bad phrasing). Especially, as we observe that while science progressed, aspects which looked like that they could not be modelled at some point
3.
by Arthur8 4y ago
Is it a counter-example though? We currently seem not to possess the tools to model the principles of consciousness, but I think the parent was going in the direction of aspects of reality that in principle evade mathematical modelling. Thu
4.
by Arthur8 5y ago
"2d construction drawings are usually enough to reason about your mechanical problems and I wish there was an open source software that would augment the worklflow based on a pencil-and-paper metaphor." Last year I was looking for
5.
by Arthur8 5y ago
Interesting phrasing. You could say that they implemented a process that has a exploitable judicial bug and one would like to avoid exploitable processes. The question for the future is , what is needed to have a process (Software, Laws, No
6.
by Arthur8 5y ago
Just to nitpick. What has the first to do with the second? If I finance my free-to-eat restaurant by stealing bikes, the first part (free-to-eat) does not justify the second (stealing). One could even argue, that If I am upfront about this
7.
by Arthur8 10y ago
It seems that the part about the Neutron EDM is outdated. As far as I know CryoEDM was deconstructed (The experiment hall was empty two years ago) [1]. Maybe there is a follow up experiment, but it has been very quiet recently. As an curre