Art9681

6 ms·

31.
by Art9681 2mo ago
There are a bunch of them they just don't get the attention because China has flooded the social media channels and is exceedingly good at drowning out the discourse with their benchmaxxed models. AllenAI and IBM are two companies that
32.
by Art9681 2mo ago
These folks are completely unaware that they have witnessed creative and high quality generative AI content without realizing what it was. Because that's the thing. Good generative AI is invisible per se. And it is a lot more ubiquitou
33.
by Art9681 2mo ago
Of course it has. Do not expect these stories to be disclosed by the Chinese labs like the American ones do. The good thing is that since the weights are available for download, third parties will disclose their misbehavior. The Great Firew
34.
by Art9681 2mo ago
A wire transfer happened.
35.
by Art9681 2mo ago
They cherrypicked benchmarks. The ONE weighed benchmark where is beats Opus5 by 0.1 points is what was linked because that's how propaganda works. The Agentic Index that includes the full benchmark suite has it in 5th place. Might as w
36.
by Art9681 3mo ago
Given all of the CVE's being published for software that's been around decades and being tended to by the most talented businesses and individuals in the world, the least of my concerns are vibe coded projects that will never be u
37.
by Art9681 3mo ago
OP folks in here are trying to give you legit advice and you're handwaving a lot of it. Listen to them. You're not the first nor the last person to have this idea. You can ignore all of the advice if you choose but I urge you to n
38.
by Art9681 3mo ago
Of course they did.
39.
by Art9681 3mo ago
The absolute best way to prove this works is by releasing a model that was fine-tuned with this method and then showing benchmarks depicting the improvement delta between the base model and the fine tuned one. The work is not done. Then rel
40.
by Art9681 3mo ago
The "ensemble of models" is nothing new. It's just that it's not really a moat that can be monetized. In the end you're always paying for something. You can engineer an elaborate harness with multiple models but it
41.
by Art9681 3mo ago
All you have to do is go to the technical Reddits to know this is absolutely true. The AI related ones are even worse.
42.
by Art9681 3mo ago
Wait till they get the heretic treatment. It's going to be great.
43.
by Art9681 3mo ago
Scale is everything. It's what enabled the modern world. There is a moat. It's easy to prove. Serve your model to billions of users per month.
44.
by Art9681 3mo ago
I am a big supporter of AI and use it heavily. I agree with this. It's not about AI at all. It's about a blanket ban to prevent deceit when selling a product or service. It should be depicted as it is. AI just lowers the barrier f
45.
by Art9681 3mo ago
That's not what the actual data shows. The American frontier providers captured the entire market. China is getting the scraps. https://gs.statcounter.com/ai-chatbot-market-share
46.
by Art9681 4mo ago
Yes but I trust the middle aged lady trying to make an honest living than what will likely be an Actually Indian from halfway across the world peeking into my home in a room full of other Indian's gossiping about the customers standard
47.
by Art9681 4mo ago
"... teleoperation assistance when needed to guarantee task completion." NOPE. Close tab. If this does not work without an internet connection then it's DOA. I should only have to connect it for software updates. Other than t
48.
by Art9681 4mo ago
Yea not touching this with an any-foot pole. They are just keeping up with the Joneses now. There is no reason for this to exist but there IS a reason it is not open source. ;)
49.
by Art9681 4mo ago
Unequivocally false. Models have different behaviors, parameters, tool calling templates, etc. The providers publish extensive documentation on all of this. Yes, you can take the quick way and swap a model, but it will not run at its full p
50.
by Art9681 4mo ago
No nation is going to willingly release a model that can be used against it. Not even China. The moment they have a Mythos class model, they will go through the same process. The AmericanCorp models are far ahead of any other models so we s
51.
by Art9681 4mo ago
They can easily issue an order for any American company to stop hosting/serving the models. If the model was a threat to national security because of its capabilities then a lot of other countries would follow, including China. No nati
52.
by Art9681 4mo ago
This is because of the safeguards and not the model capabilities. If these folks signed up for the proper cyber service offered by Anthropic where refusals are removed then the open weight model wouldn't look as capable.
53.
by Art9681 4mo ago
I don't think they "allow" Google or Amazon to host them so much as Anthropic itself is deploying and managing their services on multiple cloud providers just like every other global scale business. Even the models served via
54.
by Art9681 4mo ago
Because this proves you can't build a reliable business on top of American frontier providers. They really shot themselves in the foot here. There is a lot of eroded trust. Legit business has very little incentive going forward buildin
55.
by Art9681 4mo ago
It's the AWS CEO being a little snitch to gain favor from the Government. That is what this is about.
56.
by Art9681 4mo ago
Pull the models off of Bedrock and ban IPs from known Amazon origins. Done.
57.
by Art9681 4mo ago
Europe is irrelevant in world affairs. It's an uncomfortable truth. They are not a powerful actor. I'm not saying this proudly. EU is idealistic. A political religion. They don't play realpolitik. Which is why the EU has no p
58.
by Art9681 4mo ago
EU loves to shoot itself in the foot. It will cease to exist in less than 50 years. You know its true.
59.
by Art9681 4mo ago
Confirmation bias. The internet has complained about software updates decades before LLMs became ubiquitous. I made a career fixing human slop by domain experts. We easily forget that the great majority of software engineering is fixing the
60.
by Art9681 5mo ago
I would suggest that you reverse those roles. gpt-5.5 as the implementer and Opus as the reviewer.

More ›