Arkhaine_kupo

4 ms·

1.
by Arkhaine_kupo 22d ago
For some of us, it mimics late 19th century europe where the rate of innovation perhaps was only matched by the lack of regard for cost, safety or need. I think we are closer to seeing the Chinese Hindenburg than Arpanet or Moon voyage or s
2.
by Arkhaine_kupo 1mo ago
> Don’t we have enough taxes? Objectively no. For example carbon taxes or other environmental taxes have been proposed by free market advocates since the 70s and never been implemented (from the left you see advocacy for environmentalism
3.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> The art may have been created independently, but rich money laundering is the main reason why that art is considered valuable. Again, no. The art is valuable because of many compounding reasons. The interest of rich families, like Gugg
4.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> CIA funding helped keep Abstract Expressionist artists like Jackson Pollock afloat No. I swear CIA exploits go through so many games of telephone, that reality is whatever people want by the end. The CIA was involved in including artis
5.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> The Yale study is where the almost two year figure came from yes, the figure that a small sample of people had long period of protein in them. But most people they looked at had none, which was what they expected. The average time of i
6.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> : People will say that public health officials told them "masks don't work." But no! Only one person did I think Fauci might have had a statement early. But tbh every other scientist said the opposite, every doctor said
7.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> A democracy cannot function when its members are low-functioning, and when bad information dominates. A discussion as old as time. Plato considered voting a skill, and if you were shit at it, then you shouldnt be voting
8.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> There is a legitimate discussion of what can be mandated you do to your body. But we have already protocols and frameworks on public health. Also plenty of other medical choices are taken with way less input of experts (see abortion di
9.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> I was upset to enter a medical era Did we enter a new era or where you not paying attention or affecting you before? Reminds me of the old adage of: Q: "Why is no one speaking about this?" R: "Is no one talking about th
10.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> People were assured that COVID vaccine mRNA would disappear within days and the spike protein would short-lived which is still the case, even in the Yale study. > That is a massive gap between what the public was told and what later
11.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> ¿Por qué no los dos? Bugdet and also because convincing idiots with guns to go see an expert who is going to trigger their fear of irrelevance is a quick way to get them to use that gun, either on the therapist or themselves. > If y
12.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> it certainly belongs in the hands of citizens to defend themselves against corporations and governments. this strategy is only employed by one country in the planet. the goverment used illegal funds to start a paramilitary border poli
13.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> rapidly developing if the speed comes at the cost of not making reasonable ethical considerations, is that not something that should be looked at?
14.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
1) If you ask a language model to make an image of a Begonia ferox leaf without training it with images as well is this not true also of humans? 2) The idea that there is a non-compressed prior is already philosophical no? It seems to just
15.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> out of fear it might offend people to even acknowledge it. this didnt happen btw the grooming gangs have largely had white perpetrators and all investigations into the police found that they simply do not listen to women, specially tho
16.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> But if you've not yet seen a deceleration We have though. The velocity remains high but the acceleration is decreasing. The improvement between gpt 2-4 where staggering. to 5, 5.6? Much less so. The results improve of course, but
17.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> I thought it was rape-rape, not giving foster home girls drugs and gifts in exchange for sex they might or might not have enjoyed. Many of the girls are underage, and cannot consent, coercing them to do it will always be ra pe
18.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
The hoax is two fold 1) is that the main predictor is race 2) that the cases were uninvestigated because of race Neither is true. Dozens of cases all found commonalities, and they were working class victims and police lack of professionalis
19.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
Rotherdam is the most famous case yes. But there are dozens in the UK sadly, and most were not commited by people with any asian heritage. However they also got a fraction of the news coverage. The Rotherdam police had been investigated 3 t
20.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
> 've heard rightwing people call BBC absolute trash for not covering the rape gangs. yeah so the story about that... its mostly a right wing hoax. The real story is as follows, many police departments refused to help working class
21.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
The CEO was placed by the conservative party in 2017 ending decades of impartiality. He is a hack with a background in tabloid news, which has slowly swept into BBC entire ecosystem. Their entire political reporting side is headlined by Lau
22.
by Arkhaine_kupo 2mo ago
That is a weird accusation considering the fact that the BBC is still hiding an internal report they made about their Israel / Palestine reporting after they were accused of antisemitism in the early 2000s. If the report exonerated the
23.
by Arkhaine_kupo 3mo ago
You remain skeptical of something proven through leaked emails? https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-execs-scheme-to-i...
24.
by Arkhaine_kupo 3mo ago
> The thesis of these competitors was that Google got worse because of bad product decisions or implementation failures. But they did though. Google results got significantly worse after ads started lagging in revenue. So they hindered s
25.
by Arkhaine_kupo 3mo ago
> Maybe it's your algorithm Nope, its just the set up of Youtube. The front page is by design around 60% videos you have already watched. Best case scenario. It used to be 9 videos in 3 rows of 3. now its 2 videos, then 5 shorts. I
26.
by Arkhaine_kupo 3mo ago
There are multiple ways to respond to that and I will try and summarise them. Current believe is that its a "winner takes all market", so companies are acting rationally and using Brute Force compute to get there first. Training c
27.
by Arkhaine_kupo 3mo ago
> better business model than whatever anthropic is doing. going after business is a more secure long term recurring revenue source. Its boring but it works. It just doesnt justify trillions of dollars in investment > ads is the only a
28.
by Arkhaine_kupo 3mo ago
> The content is the most varied If no one can find it, you basically have a modern digital version of the "if a tree falls and no one hears it does it make a sound". Discoverability in youtube is currently absurdly shit. The a
29.
by Arkhaine_kupo 3mo ago
> Add regulation/enforcement to the big companies and you often shut out the smaller ones following. That is the case, any regulation increases the cost to enter a market. But in this case, its irrelevant because the moat of cost to
30.
by Arkhaine_kupo 3mo ago
> The data consistently shows that non-voters have lower trust in institutions. the data there in page 30 is kind of the smoking gun to what I was saying. Non voters and trump voters have a much higher percentage of not using AI things l

More ›