ArchReaper

9 ms·

31.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
I'm not sure I follow your question. It's Javascript. Code goes from top to bottom. You can't write: function doThing(target) { console.log(myVar); const myVar = target.prop; } Because that's inv
32.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Unless I'm missing something, you don't need all that just to have 'componentDidMount' eg: export const useMounted = (f) => { useEffect(f, []); } Edit: originally: export const useMounted = (f
33.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
To do 'componentDidMount' you simply need a 'useEffect' with an empty (non-null) dependency array. It makes sense to me - maybe the issue is more familiarity than simplicity? Edit: useEffect performs a side effect every
34.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
After using hooks for a while, I have to disagree with most of your points. The issue is not clarity or simplicity, it's familiarity. Once you start actually using hooks, things make a ton of sense. It's a different way to think a
35.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Anyone know how this compares to Insomnia/Postman? Ever since Postman started getting worse I switched to Insomnia and haven't looked back.
36.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Actually the downvotes are coming from people who don't have experience developing websites to support Safari. >The downvotes are happening because this would have been as possible to achieve in Safari as in Chrome had the author ch
37.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Correct. Safari is a dumpster fire when it comes to modern CSS support. Hence 'Safari is the new IE'
38.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
I think you're really missing the point of this entire discussion in the first place. This came up because of a client request. Your question about whether people from other countries can be considered trustworthy is completely irrelev
39.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
>The browser literally highlights the selection so that seems like a solved problem. It's nowhere close to a solved problem, and is much more complex than this. Give a read through the comments in the OP for a taste of why.
40.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
It's absolutely not a reasonable thing to define and target. The bottom line is the feature is a FEATURE and will continue to exist, so trying to police how far websites take it is ultimately a non-starter. Browser vendors could hypoth
41.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Both of your answers assume there is a simple and easy way to identify what is "visible on screen" - which if you read through the OP, you will understand that is not an achievable concept.
42.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
That still does not answer the question of "what are we asking permission for?" Why that is a hard question can be understood by reading through the discussions in the OP.
43.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
I encourage you to read through the OP first on why your suggestion (remove copy-modification entirely) is not reasonable.
44.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
>I would still rather my browser only copy the text that I visibly highlighted. It is annoying to edit content out that I have carefully selected. Absolutely. But how do we solve that problem and still allow proper usage of it? Removing
45.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Ok. So you're editing a sheet on google docs, you highlight part of it to copy into another doc. You hit ctrl+c. What happens? Do we not let Google modify what you just copied to inject the actual rich-text version of what you highligh
46.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
I think your suggestion would actually make things worse, because it would cause more people to have a false sense of security when copying from a web browser, which is exactly the problem in the first place. The issue is not that the clipb
47.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
What an insane take. You're essentially arguing that we shouldn't try to address security issues, because the person exploiting it wouldn't like that?
48.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
1. As mentioned in the OP, there are numerous ways to add content to a copy event, and 'not visible' is not a 'real thing' - see discussion in the OP 2. What are we asking the user? Permission to copy from the website? 3
49.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Why is this being posted? This "issue" has existed for a long, long time, and it is not specific to any single browser.
50.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
1) No 2) * Escape velocity is the velocity required to counter the force of gravity, ie 'away' or 'out' from the center of the planet, opposite the force of gravity. * Edit: Looks like I'm wrong, guess I slept tha
51.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
That thread is disgusting. It's crazy how many people in that thread seem to be suits with no dev comprehension whatsoever, talking about shit that can tank the reputation of their company. >I'm not familiar with the term &quot
52.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Curious to know what planet you guys live on that you think you could put non-opt-in 3rd party telemetry on enterprise-level software and not get this kind of feedback.
53.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Why are websites still hijacking scroll behavior in 2019? I can't even take the article seriously with my scrolling bouncing and glitching all over the place.
54.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Not to be a dick, but this just feels like an ad for their training product. There's no re-enaction, 'Re-Enact' is referring to their training course that they want you to buy. The meat of the article takes up 2 out of the 13
55.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Cached version: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BBB9Vi...
56.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
This is pretty bad on KitSplit's part. How can they even advertise that the owner is covered by a full deposit if the owner doesn't get compensated with it upon theft? That's blatant misleading advertising, hope this blows up
57.
by ArchReaper 7y ago
Sure, but stupid people don't understand the concept of scientific legitimacy. That's a large part of the problem with modern politics.
58.
by ArchReaper 8y ago
So the NSA could listen in.
59.
by ArchReaper 8y ago
At the bottom of the page: >Produced using pandoc and panflute with templates derived from gitbook and bookdown. http://pandoc.org/ http://scorreia.com/software/panflute/ https://www
60.
by ArchReaper 8y ago
Because not every country/company will let the US legal system steamroll people. They have no legal obligation to, so it's up to their discretion.

More ›