Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Aperocky
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
That's a natural result of introducing LLM to current standard software development without modifying the rest of it (the part that doesn't involve creating code).
32.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
I think at the end of this we'll have a new software engineering paradigm. Mostly nobody now worry about binaries or instructions because those are for the compilers, even undefined behavior are mostly ignored. You can either tailor th
33.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
That would only works until it doesn't. The suppliers got supplier too and those in turn have their own supplier. I don't know about any specific contract but I bet there's a force majeure or price excluding input cost somewh
34.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Read the whole article expecting it to explain how it would have changed, was disappointed to not read that.
35.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
While I appreciate the positivity, but I've honestly grown to appreciate grammar mistakes. Just like it's not X, it's Y indicated AI, those indicated that the effort behind was human. Honestly, no need to write 4000 words if
36.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
It's honestly unbelievable how people continue to paste stuff like this. Do they not know that credibility is lost instantly?
37.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
That commit count alone should not become any problem for infrastructure, even for Azure. They probably developed some ungodly mess with actions that did not/could not translate very well on Azure infrastructure.
38.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
That only work on smaller business/organization.
39.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Depend on your definition of vibe coding - if it means code came out from a LLM vs. keyboard, you can bet that most updated software had some of it now. But if you mean "Built me a GTA6", the answer is zero, because LLMs simply do
40.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
> Being behind just a little bit can have exponential consequences. That seems to be the argument of Dario, Sam et. al., but I'm not ready to believe it. Time will tell, but this can be a marathon and Anthropic and OpenAI is in gett
41.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Spot on. There's a certain level of drinking the kool-aid or getting high on their own supply. Anthropic is a lot worse than OpenAI but OpenAI had to go through rounds of shedding.
42.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
bepr: https://github.com/Aperocky/bepr . This allow shell access to your hosts behind NAT/Wifi with a server over outbound websocket, all by using the exact same package for client + server + user. Minimal footprin
43.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
I don't think it's the widespread condemnation, I think it's some high paying customer and potential investor telling them to stick it.
44.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Ownership isn't active usage though - My parents have their laptops (and probably 4+, since they do have retired ones stashed), but just don't use it, especially now that they retired.
45.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
> I was forced to downgrade to Opus, So you were forced to downgrade to opus because you dared to challenge the output of fable?
46.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
I thought exactly this until I used it for >2 hours.
47.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
It's funny because Anthropic is the most likely place that this happens. They are the only one crying out loud about how dangerous their models are and are presumably also training their models heavily to be "safe". And throu
48.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
yeah the original map was not for this purpose. Though I would say there are heavy assumption made for 2026 too, namely the flights are available immediately upon demand.
49.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Added it in full. It still squarely falls under "this is for fun/are you seriously doing this for this purpose" territory for me. git operate on the filesystem level, the unix behavior is just getting buried. You cannot rewri
50.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
> A pretty fun experiment and I think we can shape this into something truly useful to the whole community. Agree with first half of this sentence, we should all have fun with experiments. > It was never based on a linkable and reentr
51.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
> This is a map that shows the distance you can travel in a given length of time, and the first one was created in 1881 showing travel times from London. The first item on the article, the first thing it showed, was wrong though. It is 1
52.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Oh, Far less. It's getting to a point that it's offputting, and the next step would be to put it into "untrusted" bucket. Opus 4.7 already burned their credibility once, 2 more strikes remain.
53.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Maybe, but I've never interacted with it on my 5+ apple devices, so I'm blissfully unaware.
54.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
On face value, this feels borderline malicious. But at the same time, it's quite funny because they seem high on their own supply. The recent communiques from claude do not pass objectivity check. And if Opus 4.6 -> Opus 4.7 -> O
55.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
> Microsoft put forth a vision for a new ecosystem of hardware devices under the banner of Project Solara While I don't necessarily disagree with their vision but if implemented like "Copilot for Windows" I don't see
56.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Apologies since this sounds traumatic, but in this case, would zoom + docusign not have ate the business eventually?
57.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
I think discussion here are missing that most people do not own a PC/laptop and if they do barely ever opens one, and not because they can't afford it, but it just didn't fit into their daily lives. This is obviously entirely
58.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
> There was no build step and no deployment pipeline. You changed a .php file. You refreshed the browser. The change was live. This was fast. It was messy. The language let you mix HTML and SQL in the same file. It did not stop you from
59.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Well I think that's the next trillion dollar question, if you can figure it out. We don't need to know the entire knowledge base of mankind to want or know what to do next. It points to an entirely separate architecture than LLM.
60.
▲
by
Aperocky
4mo ago
Yes, let's build a 40K line main loop! I wonder if they thought claude code need to be more like an LLM to work lmao.
More ›