Aozaki_Touko

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by Aozaki_Touko 14y ago

   If you don't understand what "non destructive" means in the context of an image editor you obviously will never grasp why PS is actually better than the GIMP, and it's only ONE of the bigger example I took to compare them. http://help.ado
2. 2.▲
   by Aozaki_Touko 14y ago

   If you're a professional though you don't exactly have "zero money". The amount spent on a DSLR alone is bigger than what you'd spend in a Photoshop license. The only way that would make the GIMP an alternative to photoshop would be for you
3. 3.▲
   by Aozaki_Touko 14y ago

   Neither are necessarily better ? it shows how much use you have for a professional image editing package : NONE. It has been a long time since I've picked up Photoshop (as in I'm used to its interface) so I can't say whether it's really har
4. 4.▲
   by Aozaki_Touko 14y ago

   Well I don't think they ever had the gall to do it to their pro market but they did void the warranty for some of their consumers when they installed linux. http://linux.slashdot.org/story/07/03/27/1753218/hp-dishonor... As did other comp