Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Andrew_Quentin
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
14 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Slavery, World War II and Prison Camps in a time of peace! How are they comparable?
92.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
"why DO we continue?" To be is rare, to not be is not. Rare things are precious for their novelty if nothing else. We are going to die in any event, so we might as well live while we can.
93.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
I was under the impression that they were flying on a privately owned plane. That does not seem to be the case, but it may be on their next leg of the journey. I do not have direct knowledge, but I would think that if the plane is of the di
94.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
I would think the plane is safe and perhaps the plane could be considered as territory of the nation of the diplomat therefore the diplomat could offer him asylum on the plane if need be, but I may be wrong about the latter.
95.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
"If you were just now appalled to learn about the changes made to FISA with the PATRIOT act, you are 12 years behind the times." The leaked documents are TOP SECRET. By definition top secret documents are not public knowledge. If
96.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
What evidence is suspect? Here is one new thing - The president has admitted that this programme exists while before in congressional committees it was denied. The president stated that nobody listens to your data when evidence has been pre
97.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Repeated talking points ad nauseum. Wasn't Manning tortured? Isn't Snowden going from one country to another? What makes you think the case of Assange is any different? Have we all forgotten how 3 years ago when the revelations fi
98.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Yup, and it is what has always led to war.
99.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
I think you missed the point. He was basically saying that Obama and Bush are the same.
100.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
If the president can't stand up to it, who can?
101.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
The buck stops with Obama. Ignorance or incompetence is in some ways worse than lying as he might have some good reason to lie.
102.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Welcome to rhetorics 101
103.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Why don't you sue and find out?
104.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Spying on an enemy government is way different from spying on civilians.
105.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
I think its rather that no one has tested the above argument. The judgement was in 1953, so it had nothing to say about the internet or data stored in the US.
106.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Maybe time was a factor, perhaps he was ready to publish his story or close to doing so. Then there is also the tactic of hiding in plain sight. All of what you mentioned could however be a coincidence, but that doesn't seem to be the
107.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
A private contract can not make you guilty of criminal offences.
108.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Since 1917? I'd think quite a few
109.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Arguably the whole programme is illegal.
110.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Who said it is legal or illegal? If some law contravenes the constitution that law is not legal therefore whatever the law says should not be done is legal.
111.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
You boil a frog slowly. If such thing as torture, surveillance, indefinite imprisonment without trial, secretive kill list, secretive removal of right (no fly list) etc, become normalized and accepted, then a huge part of what forms a free
112.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
This is 1953 though, a time when cars were still a very new and sometimes unreliable thing.
113.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
The next question is, why is it so much higher in America? Homelessness is a moral as well as practical problem. How can more than half a million people have no home in the richest country on earth?
114.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
How can they just be put under a gag order? Can you challenge these gag orders? If not then surely they are unconstitutional so you can just go ahead and break them.
115.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
Squares or city centres are a good place, the Times Square being probably the best.
116.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
That seems to be no different than the law applied to any citizen.
117.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
You are mistaken. There are polls which show that the majority of Americans care far more about privacy than fighting terrorism.
118.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
It is a rhetorical tactic of whisking the issue away. Hey guys, this is old news, lets not talk about it.
119.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
I think there's a difference between the media and the populace.
120.
▲
by
Andrew_Quentin
13y ago
How can they rule the justification as unconstitutiona when the judges were giving court orders under that justification? More broadly though, I don't understand how you can possibly have secret courts. Justice not only must be done bu
More ›