3 ms·
How can they rule the justification as unconstitutiona when the judges were giving court orders under that justification? More broadly though, I don't understa
by Andrew_Quentin 13y ago
How can they rule the justification as unconstitutiona when the judges were giving court orders under that justification?
More broadly though, I don't understand how you can possibly have secret courts. Justice not only must be done but must be seen to be done, otherwise its not justice.
- eightyone 13y agoI'm not a lawyer, but I believe they declared only part of FISA unconstitutional. The part they declared unconstitutional happens to be the primary crux of the legal argument for PRISM. I don't understand how you can have secret courts either. It's a perversion of what this country was founded upon.
- rdl 13y agoI'm personally most interested in ACLU's challenges about Tor/VPN providers and FAA.
- JanezStupar 13y agoSecret courts are not about justice. They are about masking injustice behind the veil of "law". Since US is a country with long tradition of rule of law. The easiest way of subverting the rule of law is by subverting the concept of a judge and of a court. There.