Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
AlekseN
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
Show HN: Type a formula, watch it become Clique, Hamiltonian Cycle, and Knapsack
(aidoctrine.github.io)
1 points
by
AlekseN
2mo ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
Show HN: Design proteins from one formula, zero training data – runs in browser
(aidoctrine.github.io)
1 points
by
AlekseN
5mo ago
|
0 comments
3.
▲
by
AlekseN
7mo ago
Hi HN, I'm an independent researcher and I built an interactive tool that lets you explore structures in three classical number theory problems Collatz sequences, Riemann zeta zeros, and twin prime distributions all running client-side
4.
▲
Show HN: Interactive Browser Constructor for Collatz, Riemann, and Twin Primes
(aidoctrine.github.io)
2 points
by
AlekseN
7mo ago
|
1 comments
5.
▲
by
AlekseN
9mo ago
Excellent numerology! But here's the key question: can your e-polynomial derive OTHER constants? UCT's π-formula α⁻¹ = 4π³ + π² + π isn't chosen because it's "close" it's chosen because the SAME geometric
6.
▲
by
AlekseN
9mo ago
Good catches! 1. You're right I should clarify: the formula uses Σ⁺ (1189.37 MeV), not Σ⁰ (1192.642 MeV). Different isospin states. Σ⁺ - Λ = 73.69 MeV UCT: 12² × mₑ = 73.58 MeV Error: 0.14% 2. Two parts: a) &qu
7.
▲
by
AlekseN
9mo ago
Author here. Zero free parameters. Here are the top three predictions: 1. Stack 12 oranges around one. Square it: 144. Multiply by electron mass. Result: Σ−Λ = 73.58 MeV This is the mass difference between two types of baryons (Σ and
8.
▲
Show HN: The kissing number theorem predicts particle masses from sphere packing
(colab.research.google.com)
2 points
by
AlekseN
9mo ago
|
6 comments
9.
▲
by
AlekseN
10mo ago
Fair point – numerology concern is valid. Key differences: 1. K(3)=12, K(8)=240 are PROVEN theorems (Schütte 1953, Levenshtein 1979), not arbitrary choices. These are the only numbers that solve the sphere packing problem. 2. τ=7 derives fr
10.
▲
by
AlekseN
10mo ago
Author here. Important context: I'm not a physicist – this emerged from months of collaborative work with AI (Claude), exploring geometric patterns in fundamental constants. Formula: M_Pl/m_e = π^45 × (1 + 2α + α/13 − (8/
11.
▲
by
AlekseN
1y ago
Extended results and safety relevance Temperature stability tests Claude 3.5 Haiku: 180/180 AE-1 matches at T=0.0, 0.8, 1.3 GPT-4o: 180/180 matches under the same conditions Statistical significance: p ≈ 1×10⁻⁵⁴ Theory of Mi
12.
▲
Show HN: Theory of Mind benchmark for 8 LLMs with reproducible markers
1 points
by
AlekseN
1y ago
|
1 comments