Ajakks

5 ms·

31.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
Thanks for sharing this - I need to give these guys more money - this is the journalism we need right now. There are so many trials in the future for these 1,500 people.
32.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
Oh - so the kid went out and he got permission to do this? Where is that? Who approved his request?
33.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
Who cares? The Treasury Secretary shouldn't have family profiting off fixing illegal policy the Treasury Secretary enacted. That should never happen. It is wrong, it doesn't explicitly spelled out.
34.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
What a week argument - your still making excuses for this nonsense. Ridiculous.
35.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
This is actually quite good and you ought to be proud of it! You have an almost trigger attention grab - from a marketing/advertising pov, I'll repeat, this is quite good. I wish the content was different but only bc I think it wi
36.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
I have extensively used AI - its not as capable as you think it is. I frequently run into hard limits of its ability - I understand what recursive means in the sense of an AI, I can see it folding into itself pieces of this and that of what
37.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
Where did I strawman? And might be the 1st time in my life that I was strawmanned, with an accusation of pulling a strawman - thats pretty fantastic actually, I'll give you that. Otherwise I wrote a book on the other comment on this -
38.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
I am making no claims about slop - I think that saying, "AI slop is going to ruin the internet" is something that itself requires further clarification. I'm assuming you are advocating for AI to "go away" or be ban
39.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
You act as if the internet was like a high society book club - all the previous articles were written by ivy league grads. I recall geocities, angelfire, all the chans. The internet has always been a cesspool with little islands of quality
40.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
Every time I open my phone and find myself back on this comment thread, I find new nonsense. If you are "anti-AI" and you’ve never changed or evolved your argument - I suggest a pause, a step back and a substantial revaluation. So
41.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
They are describing the artistic qualities that something must posess to be actual artwork - which is relevant to copyrighting artworks, and is also that had been discussed, by Artists and Creators - the entire time They did not write an e
42.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
As someone who has actually studied art - right back at you. All the most famous paintings are done like a hundred times - certain scenes were done by ALL Masters, as like a rite of passage or proof of arrival - pretty much the whole time b
43.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
You clearly only get sloppy from the machine -> hence your entire understanding, you did some googling, found others with the same experience and you took up this position. Meanwhile, random person, gets the exact same AI that you used t
44.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
Its interesting you mention a toddler drawing for 2 hours - I can say with certainty that toddler drawing will demonstrate more creativity than this argument and, every iteration of it, I see every single day. Smh Actual creators understand
45.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
What if they didnt try to kill us tho? What if the world is so interconnected now, that we actually could hold hands - especially if we already had those asteroids already at the Lagrange points - if we were "post-scarcity" as a s
46.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
In theory, these new "tactical" systems are better able to engage military targets. In practice, a 500-kiloton payload can also be used to blanket a wide area with total destruction. Nagasaki was 21 kilotons, which means an averag
47.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
MAD is actually a myth - especially when it was invented in the 60s, its more so now, in theory, but in all practical sense - nobody can use the massive nukes, they would prolly melt the polar ice and screw the climate for sure... but, havi
48.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
Well, my comment was flagged, so apparently it wasnt taken lightly by everyone. You don't need a missile for everyone - I don't want to offend anyone but, you only have to use them in such a way that everyone else is affected. Lik
49.
by Ajakks 8mo ago
Very well said. Your whole comment I kept recalling "The Art of War" - which is of course, mostly about how not to go to war, how if you must go to war, it needs to be efficient, bc the war will decimate the State faster than the
50.
by Ajakks 9mo ago
It isnt God - Sam went a little overboard with his pushing that. AI still isnt just hype tho and remains the greatest digital tool ever made by people. The reality remains that if you adopt AI into your workforce, not replace your workforce
51.
by Ajakks 10mo ago
Haha, you speak of ivory towers without even knowing so In far more words this entire position is simply "let them eat cake" but without the excuse of a royal court distorting reality. Willful ignorance is worse.
52.
by Ajakks 10mo ago
This is the beginning. The world remade from here will be fully automated. Those new walmarts will be robots. 1/4 of us are already out of work and we still pretend this is fine.
53.
by Ajakks 10mo ago
Wow. No.
54.
by Ajakks 10mo ago
This is bad. This might be very bad. Some may use even stronger language. Almost seems like he's going down a list in opposite campaign promises - now he wants to check that "Start a War" box.
55.
by Ajakks 10mo ago
54 total participants, 18 started AI assisted and did the first 3 "trials" with full AI assistance -> compared to "search only" and "brain only" -> then in session 4, they made the AI participants go to b
56.
by Ajakks 10mo ago
I think you misunderstood science today. Scientists only do safe experiments that will 100% verify the findings they are paid to attain. Nobody will do peers review of whatever study unless its controversial- in which case they will come ou
57.
by Ajakks 11mo ago
I went to check my Social Security administration account like 4 years ago - I forget why. To access it, I have to have an actual video face to face conversation with people from some Real ID company. I'll never look at that account ag
58.
by Ajakks 11mo ago
It is an assistant. It assists creative people. AI is not and can not be creative. It can help 1 person do the work of many.
59.
by Ajakks 11mo ago
Anyone who actually uses AI, like myself, knows it is not God, nor a bubble. It won't replace all people, just the people that don't/didn't embrace it. I'm tremendously faster than my peers who don't. AI is for
60.
by Ajakks 11mo ago
Well, "spooky action at a distance" is something that believing outright at the time, literally required faith - much like the faith required of scientist today, everything comes from nothing for no reason and without cause and as

More ›