Aerroon

195 ms·

2161.
by Aerroon 6y ago
> I'd hate to just see a URI and go "OK, I am convinced ty" and automatically pick up the pitchforks against those without. Something to particularly consider are circular references. If you make the reference graph large
2162.
by Aerroon 6y ago
I wonder if a bone marrow transplant would have a similar effect. If it doesn't then it would give us a clue on what probably doesn't matter here. Edit: I should've just searched. I found this: https://www.nature.c
2163.
by Aerroon 6y ago
> If we are the rich west, why can't we just take care of everyone? What does it mean to "take care of everyone"? That their "basic needs" are met? What do you define as basic needs? I will assume that this will
2164.
by Aerroon 6y ago
> operating sweatshops Economists usually consider sweatshops to be good. It helps impoverished countries. For the workers these sweatshops usually pay better or have better working conditions than the alternatives.[0] [0] https:/
2165.
by Aerroon 6y ago
> On the contrary, it is contextually highly/entirely likely that they were _actively_ choosing to use it in a political manner. Based on what? If you go looking for things with a specific interpretation in mind you're going t
2166.
by Aerroon 6y ago
> Then she gets an angry text message from the kid's mother who believed her son was being punished specifically for making the "ok" symbol. Based on what you said, isn't that exactly what happened? This paragraph ma
2167.
by Aerroon 6y ago
I think the political side isn't even important. A lot of the behavioral patterns we see in the social justice left is what we saw with the religious right a few decades ago. I'd say it's more about adopting popular values fr
2168.
by Aerroon 6y ago
Won't these oil and gas companies simply hire their own developers to create software that they need? Doesn't that mean lots of development time will go into solving problems other projects have already solved? This seems like it
2169.
by Aerroon 6y ago
I think calling it fake news is going too far. They are incredibly partisan though, but many refuse to admit it. They also bring a lot of their ideas elsewhere.
2170.
by Aerroon 6y ago
You're absolutely not wrong that this detracts from it. However, the courts in the US won't side with the policemen on this. They seem to be rather protective of the first amendment. As an aside, police violence happens in the cou
2171.
by Aerroon 6y ago
I feel like reddit tried doing just this. You see this quite clearly when you visit niche subreddits. The problem is that the large subreddits have a larger impact on the direction the site takes. They make demands of the admins and they sp
2172.
by Aerroon 6y ago
I agree, but I think that size and the speed by which information spreads makes social media what it is. Social media is like being in a room with thousands, possibly millions, of people. If you have a gathering of this many people in real
2173.
by Aerroon 6y ago
And in those other jurisdictions you don't have free speech. A woman in Austria was convicted of blasphemy for a factual statement, because it hurts the feelings of people following that religion. Apparently our European human rights t