AdkamEup

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by AdkamEup 1y ago

   > So your argument is that because you happen to find the person attractive, the image itself is sexual? Yes, with one tweak: it's because I find the person sexually attractive. It's not the kind of attractive that urges me t
2. 2.▲
   by AdkamEup 1y ago

   I find the girl licking her gun repulsive . An instant boner killer. I hate guns, and she's a total fake, too. She may be "soliciting" alright, but the whole pose is off-putting.
3. 3.▲
   by AdkamEup 1y ago

   > I don't know if it's virtue-signalling, sexual frustration, or something else. I think de-sensitization [*] may play a big role here; I'm convinced that the more porn you look at, the higher your threshold goes. I'v
4. 4.▲
   by AdkamEup 1y ago

   I wasn't debating "suggestive". The fine article claimed (and the parent quoted), "Absolutely nothing sexual"; that's what I disagree with. I agree that the photo is not suggestive; in other words, I fully agre
5. 5.▲
   by AdkamEup 1y ago

   Wow, you've gotten downvoted. I came here for your comment. That stock photo is strikingly sexual; it immediately makes me horny. (I'm a cis-het guy nearing 50 years of age, I have an active and satisfying sex life with my wife,