Aaronontheweb

7 ms·

31.
by Aaronontheweb 1y ago
To be fair, that's because their own Azure.Identity org hadn't even shipped an update addressing this vulnerability and they work in the same building.
32.
Model Context Protocol, Without the Hype(petabridge.com)
2 points by Aaronontheweb 1y ago|0 comments
33.
The Future of AI Belongs to Experienced Operators with Good Taste(aaronstannard.com)
1 points by Aaronontheweb 2y ago|0 comments
34.
Frameworkism: Senior Software Developers' Pit of Doom(aaronstannard.com)
4 points by Aaronontheweb 2y ago|2 comments
35.
by Aaronontheweb 2y ago
We'll see how "sell AI itself as a feature" rather than building actually useful features with AI works.
36.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
> not because of liquidity problems. The liquidity problems caused the flight - why else would they take a $1.8b haircut on a securities portfolio and then try a bone-headed cap raise to cover the difference?
37.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
SVB's liquidity problems were known for months because they were a function of interest rates and failure to manage interest rate risk on their part - besides, the CEO was on the board of the SF Fed. It's not like they weren'
38.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
Not really - rewriting the rules (FDIC insurance limits) midway through because SVB's own depositors yelled "bank run!" loud enough is still moral hazard. Do I need to make sure I bank with an institution that Jason Calcanis,
39.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
That's if you ignore the secondary effects: "moral hazard," knowing that if you become big enough to create political waves in the event that you fail you can continue to gamble with depositor money, make your annual bonus, a
40.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
That $5b is definitely "insured" - the FDIC has all but nationalized US Bank deposits so long as there's widespread liquidity issues under its "systemic risk exception."
41.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
So why didn't these same banks band together and buy out SVB / its assets instead of letting it file chapter 11? Wouldn't have preventing the 2nd and 3rd biggest bank failures in U.S. history happen within a few days of each
42.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
> Big highlighter on "deposit". No government or even FDIC money is involved in this. > > It's significant that this is a private action. No evidence on my part of back this up, but assuming that the government _isn&
43.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
The number of founders I've seen screaming about how they shouldn't have to worry about spreading money out between institutions, opening accounts with more than 1 bank is "too hard," and the like is incredible.
44.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
How transparent is Scarf's product adoption metrics for OSS projects? https://about.scarf.sh/ I follow them on Twitter but haven't looked much into it other than reading their documentation, which makes me think t
45.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
Maintainer of Akka.NET here - I don't think so. Posted another comment earlier in the thread with some more details.
46.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
Maintainer of Akka.NET here - we're not really affected by this change. 1. We're still porting features that are all licensed under Apache 2.0, as other comments have mentioned. 2. None of Akka.NET's source code has been auth
47.
by Aaronontheweb 4y ago
https://www.smartdraw.com/ - SmartDraw has done this for about 20+ years. I can draw entire flowcharts using keyboard shortcuts (although I still have to click a button for split paths) and everything is automatically space
48.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
> I have a PhD related to distributed systems and I investigated the actor model a lot. > Akka.NET does not seem to innovate anything Maybe you should ask for a refund
49.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
That's a small part of a much larger trust issue with the foundation: https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/Home/discussions/38
50.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/Home/discussions/38
51.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/Home/discussions/38
52.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
Context: https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/Home/discussions/38
53.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
I can safely assure you that you don't know what you're talking about. I work on distributed actor system OSS full-time and I wouldn't have customers of the out of the box defaults that shipped with .NET Core did the job.
54.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
And it was never discussed nor has it ever really been revisited since, as you point out in your own comments on that issue. This is part of the larger issue of how the DFN interacts (or lack thereof) with its own member projects and usuall
55.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
Looks like you're right - they removed that option and added it back: https://github.com/dotnet-foundation/projects/commit/7debb15...
56.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
The issue here was Microsoft appointing itself judge and jury of which projects should have most-favored-nation status and that criteria being reflected directly into the package distribution system. Given Microsoft's singular influenc
57.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
The FSF isn't run by full-time employees of a for-profit megacap company that also owns the runtime and package distribution system the projects use though. It's also not the promise the foundation made when it first began solicit
58.
by Aaronontheweb 5y ago
This also comes on the back of the .NET Foundation now requiring new projects to assign their intellectual property, lock, stock, and barrel, to the foundation itself. You can no longer simply contribute code to the foundation - it has to o
59.
Microsoft's .NET Foundation under fire as resigning board member questions it(theregister.com)
3 points by Aaronontheweb 5y ago|0 comments
60.
Free software is suffering because coders don’t know how to write documentation(thenextweb.com)
63 points by Aaronontheweb 9y ago|61 comments

More ›