ACCount37

11 ms·

91.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
This is a "microcontroller core", not a "microcontroller". We're talking "deep embedded" applications - where an ASIC is designed for a very specific purpose, and that design just so happens to call for a
92.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
It's easy to say "just diet ez" and it's hard to "just diet". If you can administer a treatment as a simple one and done thing, that's alright. If it's a pill you got to take every day, that's pr
93.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Chuck it into an LLM lmao.
94.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Agents are a very new concept. We've got the early LLM-based AI agents in 2023, and it only became a popular, mainstream thing in 2025 - with Claude Code.
95.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
The likes of AWS and Github have scoped API keys for that purpose. But good luck trying to convince a non-tech company to implement something like this.
96.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Bots skinwalking their users inherit the behavioral scoring of that user. As a rule, they'll take a lot longer to get blocked than new bot accounts would.
97.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Hobbyist drones also don't ship with lidar in stock. The concern isn't China dominating the area of $20 toys. The concern is platforms relevant to industry and military. Whether that, in turn, can be disentangled from "the ar
98.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
That, or to avoid surrendering yet another technology relevant to the future to China. As if them manufacturing the bulk of world's solar panels, wind turbines and heading for EVs isn't bad enough.
99.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Both? People are very easy to FUD up about any local development, and they rarely bear any costs of denying those development. Being eager to uncritically lap up any FUD thrown your way is definitely a personal failing. Let alone spreading
100.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
If you give NIMBYs as much as an inch of decision-making power, they'll find a way of making you regret it. For all the talk of "negative externalities", they sure aren't shy about imposing them on others.
101.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Yep. The "noise and pollution" of a datacenter are bordering on nonexistent. The same goes for water use concerns and more. The environmental concerns are extremely overblown - but NIMBYs really don't need much to get going.
102.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
In a typical AI lab eval/RL setting, there is no "person who sent you the link". The link was given to you by an automated system, your performance will be evaluated by an automated system, and you are one of 120 independent
103.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
You've heard of 4chan for AIs, but did you hear of secret frontier lab AI hacker BBS?
104.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Frankly, I doubt the existence of "orthogonal leaps" as a distinct category with distinct properties. Just another emergent capability - one that follows exactly the same patterns any other emergent capability does.
105.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
The whole point of neural interfaces is to bypass the default wiring. If what's there in the bone stock I/O plane was sufficient, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
106.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
> non-invasive Dead in the water. It's like an omlette. Can't make a neural interface worth a damn without cracking open a few skulls.
107.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
"Doomed" no, but it's pretty clear that they just had a bad cycle and are struggling to keep up with the frontier. Whether this happened because they bet on "world models -> better reasoning" and that bet didn&#x
108.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
> Try to get a frontier model to write a clever, funny joke which hasn't been seen before. This is what I refer to when it comes to larger models like Fable 5 being funnier. They are more capable of doing that. They can deliver that
109.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
You have committed the classic blunder of confusing your abstraction layers. "Probabilistic next word prediction" and "humor" sit about as far apart as "modulating airflow with meat flaps" and "humor"
110.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Now, how long before someone rolls out some sort of 10M context hybrid attention active context management monstrosity and ruins this guy's "can't"? Start the clock. My opinion of claims like "LLMs need memory to ma
111.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
It's a very shaky position, and the empirical track record of "LLMs can't..." is in itself a reason to call it into doubt. Every "can't" of this nature was followed by a discovery of "they can, just p
112.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Saturation is mostly just selection effects in play. Throw out the "90% easiest" of tasks, and what remains is a jagged ladder of high difficulty outliers. Hard to climb, and hard to measure the climb - because you have less effec
113.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
And it held true every week of every month for the past three years. AI progress is screaming forward at a breakneck pace.
114.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
No, you openly, plainly went and downgraded your claim to a somewhat defensible one. It's not subtle. Your entire premise was wrong at every point, and now you're trying to wriggle your way out of admitting it.
115.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
The backbone of the VLA there is literally a pre-trained Gemma model. And a small one at that. You already downgraded your claims from "LLMs are irrelevant to robotics" to a measly "you can't train a useful robotics LLM
116.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Read. The. Papers. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.23705 https://www.pi.website/download/pistar06.pdf https://www.pi.website/download/pi07.pdf The thing literally has a diffusion
117.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
Off the top of my head: https://www.pi.website/blog/pi07
118.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
LLMs are incredibly good at replicating common, coarse statistical features - which is what backs "looks very convincing at a glance". If it's a general signal that's easy for you to recognize at a glance, it's a si
119.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
That's just about any video of any VLA ever. Including Gemini Robotics 2.
120.
by ACCount37 2mo ago
I'm repeating "what you claim to be impossible was done 3 years ago and was already replaced with better versions of the same idea and you are hilariously out of touch".

More ›