ABCLAW

99 ms·

421.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Sure, but when it comes to power, you can't wish away its existence. Someone will have it. So how do you best mitigate the bad effects it can have? Do you let an entity which does not align with your interests have it? Or do you mainta
422.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
This observation is the central topic explored by Dream Teams , which I'm currently almost done reading. I'm not sure if I'd recommend it, though; I like the writing style but your blurb contains a solid 50-60% of the book&#
423.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
The APA is not raised at all in any of my points and this is a state level matter so the 14th governs. I've linked the brief where you can see that this is a municipal affair in Virginia. But regardless of the jurisdiction of the claus
424.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Yes. That's what they did. They couldn't address the due process claim because it was poorly argued at first instance and the 'proper' formulation was not addressed as it was not raised earlier. Then they went off and us
425.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Nerd away. I love it. Administrative law, the 101 course, is not the same as Administrative law, the body of legal knowledge and principles, but they're certainly related. The case in question has a very specific Administrative law seg
426.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Took a while to be able to reply! Some constitutional law is also administrative law. Much in the same way that constitutional law can also be part of the law of contracts or part of the law of torts. Administrative law is the law relating
427.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
You're missing the statement right at the start: "Procedural due process" This is an admin law case (it's also a constitutional case too, so don't feel like that's not a key element and that you missed out - bo
428.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
This isn't quite right, although it's close. The question isn't whether or not a politician has the right to block. It's whether or not a politician, acting as a politician, has the right to block. If the individual had
429.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
>Are tech companies across the board allowed to shut down, disenfranchise, silence, and marginalize people and businesses because they simply disagree with their lawful politics and ideas? What if those politics and incitements aren&#x27
430.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
>Free speech wasn’t supposed to have carve outs. Sorry to be a stickler, but what exactly are you referring to here? This statement is demonstrably false at the principle level, even in Mills' work, let alone in the enabling constit
431.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Wait until you find out that mens rea exists.
432.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
I had a few conversations with Blizzard devs during the now infamous panels. They have no idea why people are angry with them. None. But that's not surprising, because they have no idea why their company was loved in the first place. T
433.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
In my line of work, whistleblower complaints often result in very concrete investigations and mitigative action being taken. One key similarity between these issues is that the problem is dealt with internally as discretely as possible. Som
434.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Actors and Actresses don't face issues getting roles on the basis that they've been priced out of the market. Issues in getting jobs have to do with the limited supply of capitalized projects, high project transactional costs (inc
435.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Not the poster you're replying to, but an examination of Legalism was presented in both law schools I attended. Additionally, I know it is also addressed in East Asian studies faculties (with additional historical context above the leg
436.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
The false negatives will only cost them money when they are litigated against consistently on the basis that they systemically aid fraud and/or engage in unlawful interference in economic relations. There might be other nice torts to d
437.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
The author has replied to me! He does not. Just a poor choice of words.
438.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Hi, thanks for replying. I'm a lawyer. I get paid a lot to communicate directly and precisely. While many people in our field are viewed as assholes, the best of us are able to be blunt while also being tactful. Being an engineer isn&#
439.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Normally injunctive relief of this type is awarded in the event that there is irreperable harm, but Qualcomm could be compensated by a per-unit license fee + penalty damage award on sold infringing items. That's why I'm surprised.
440.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
I think the more interesting part is that Apple applied for a stay pending appeal and were denied . I'm probably going to need to read the reasons directly to figure out how Qualcomm managed to get that done.
441.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
No, Qualcomm needs to post money for bonds so that if the ruling is overturned on appeal, they have funds locked away to compensate Apple. NB: the case does not deal with all IPhones, so a segment of the product line will still be vendible.
442.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Depends what class of building you're renting in. A Class B building might tidy up the place, but if you're springing for a Class A building, prestige is what you're buying into.
443.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
That could be the case! But was it clear in the article? I just reread it and the author doesn't indicate where he works at all. He does, however, quote himself saying: "[...] I’m pretty sure I’ve written that exact code?"
444.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Maybe I can provide a bit more context re: Montreal. Montreal's metro throughput is not gated by the tunnel capacity. It is gated by the amount of trains in operation. Adding additional cars on the 'already full line' would i
445.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
If my organization is called out, and the citation given is my specific work, I would consider that someone called me on my work, even if they hadn't named me. Sorry if I wasn't clear.
446.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
The tone of the article and the posts in this thread are literally the most important piece of content. This is the person who was directly called out for a specific action which broke one element of Edge functionality. His commits and comm
447.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Yes, and I think we can extend this even further. Maybe it might be even better to find a thing you both agree on and truly give a yes to that. E.g., if I disagree with somebody on the right way to solve a problem, I can at least say, &quot
448.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
I think you've taken the legal positivist philosophy (what's authorized by those who have authority is law, regardless of morality) and tried to indicate that the existence of said authorization overrides the moral and normative c
449.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
>One of the exceptions was [Person]'s family office, which managed a shit-ton of money and had some good people who actually knew something about portfolio construction. I'm not sure what type of professional you are, but you m
450.
by ABCLAW 8y ago
Infrastructure requires maintenance, and the tax base of a given piece of infrastructure is generally funded by the amount of property tax recovered in the area; this means that inappropriate developments aren't just misaligned investm

More ›