2 ms·
>One of the exceptions was [Person]'s family office, which managed a shit-ton of money and had some good people who actually knew something about portfolio cons
by ABCLAW 8y ago
>One of the exceptions was [Person]'s family office, which managed a shit-ton of money and had some good people who actually knew something about portfolio construction.
I'm not sure what type of professional you are, but you may be in breach of your responsibilities by disclosing the specifics listed above.
I know this message might seem silly, but I'd hate if you got in trouble for complimenting the guy's affairs.
Edit: I've editted out the person in question's name in case you do the same.
- syn0byte 8y agoI'd love to see Brin's lawyers explain to the court how they found the real world contact info of a random user on HN.
- rising-sky 8y agoWell, not so random, seems like it would be pretty easy when you give narrow personally identifiable snippets like "I worked at a portfolio analytics company so I had free reign to snoop around"... Who knows other similar comments they've said in other threads on HN?
- woolvalley 8y agoSubpoena HN, get IP, Subpoena ISP, get customer info, Subpoena customer, etc.
- ric2b 8y agoThe only specifics were [person]'s name. "shit-ton of money" and "good people" are not specifics.