A4ET8a8uTh0

11 ms·

91.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I never did that kind of analysis, but the point is largely moot. They are going to get the monies bar some kind of event that completely changes the rules of the game. That said, at certain point, even US government won't be able to b
92.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Have you been to US lately? This is not a rhetorical point. If you typed those words and I am expected to take those at face value, I have to assume that you have not seen the rabid mobs calling for not allowing X to speak/present&#x2F
93.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Honestly, more than the click-baity title, I was more amused by the subtle demand for even more subsidies ( that after putting US through offshoring, nearshoring and now taxpayer sponsored reshoring ): "Barrett also said Washington mus
94.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
<< If there is an equally well regarded academic And this is where it gets fun. Who is doing the regarding? MSNBC? Me? You? << But none of us should feel obliged to conjure that lecture if no such academic exists. In US alone, w
95.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Thank you. This was a good exchange for me.
96.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
You know, this is actually an interesting approach, but I will wait to see how you are going to respond to what I am about to say. Chomsky sometimes argued that you simply do not get to certain levels of corporate media unless you are alrea
97.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
<< the equitable decision is to have the lecture now. Sure assuming lecture titled "Why is Trump worse than Hitler?" is paired with another lecture along the lines of "Why is Kamala worse than Mao?" If you can&#x27
98.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Ahh, the llm defense.. I genuinely expected a little more. Shame.
99.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
<< but haven't responded to this one. I am apparently rate limited in what I can post; nothing personal. You can blame HN/Dang/God/whathave you as needed. << Please find us any professor of social sciences wh
100.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I go where the argument takes me. Is it my fault that OP did not actually check the background of the person they were defending on ( apparently based on this fact alone ) purely political grounds? No, how dare I actually read the article a
101.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Friend. After one of the more recent bigger political event in US, which, in more sane times, would have made most people pause, I asked people from 'the other side', if they would be willing to reconsider their current stance on
102.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
<< > I am very, very pro-free speech I bet. *** I addressed commentator comment with another poster, but if you were to look at my other posts, it is not hard to see the way I lean. You would lose that bet friend.
103.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Know that I love you. Her very own web page states the following: "Historian, Educator, and Commentator" That is her words ( or at least someone who built it for her ), not mine. So you are 1/3 right? Same page has interviews
104.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I find it interesting. Basic google check suggests that Ben-Ghiat is a political commentator. If that is true and accurate then her presence and presentation at Naval Academy is at best an opinion and not strictly a 'lecture'. I h
105.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Sigh, it used to be at least woods offered respite from ever-present cameras. I am starting to think I should stop trying to fight the impending 'Transmetropolitan' future.
106.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I chuckled, but that is actually an interesting ( and very doable ) fun project idea.
107.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
<< Archive has them all. Thank you. I added those to my reading list. I don't think I ever delved into the topic. << Often written by serious practitioners who dedicate their life to it rather than internet-dwelling dabbler
108.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
<< It's not wasteful if: the student "values" the credential but not the learning. Hmm, I could try repeating the value argument from the other end, but lets approach it differently. You mention a credential itself bein
109.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
My friend. Thank you. It is not often I get to be myself lately. Allow me to retort in kind. Your original response to my response was in turn a response to the following sentence by "snovv_crash": "This isn't a matter o
110.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I think this is why I am kinda debating what personally I can do about it ( in a reasonably efficient way ). And I admit I am on the fence. I try to donate funds to some worthy causes ( like EFF ) every so often and IA might be getting some
111.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I am here to learn. You can help me by educating me. I do mean it sincerely. If you think you have a grasp on the subject, I think HN as a whole could benefit from your expertise.
112.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I hope it will not sound too preachy. You are right in a sense that it is what he thinks he is paying for, but is actually missing out on untapped value. He will not be able to discuss death as a concept throughout the lens of various autho
113.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
You are only technically correct. And even then, in terms of civics, by having people held criminally liable government is telling you what to do ( or technically not do ). Note that no other body can ( legally ) do it. In fact, false impri
114.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Good point. I agree, but it goes back to some level of unwillingness to do this the 'old way'. That is not say there won't be cheaters ( they always are ), but that is what proctor is for. And no, I absolutely hated the onlin
115.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I suppose we all get from school what we put into it. I forgot the name of the guy, who said it, but he was some big philosophy lecturer at Harvard and his view on the matter ( heavy reading course and one student left a course review - &q
116.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Yep, some with fun results. I occasionally amuse myself now by asking for X in the style of writing of fictional figure Y. It does have moments.
117.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Sadly, this is not what is happening. Based on the article ( and personal experience ), it is clear that we tend to happily accept computer output as a pronouncement from the oracle itself. It is new tech, but people do not treat it as such
118.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
<< The grade was ultimately changed, but not before she received a strict warning: If her work was flagged again, the teacher would treat it the same way they would with plagiarism. << But that doesn't scale at all. I reali
119.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
I hesitate, because I shudder at government deciding which algorithm is best for a given scenario ( because that is effectively is where it would go ). Maybe the distinction is, the moment money changes hands based on product? I am not an e
120.
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Not defending attacker, because I see IA as common good. That said one of the messages from this particular instance reads almost as if they were trying to help by pointing out issues that IA clearly missed: "Whether you were trying to

More ›