4 ms·
Have you been to US lately? This is not a rhetorical point. If you typed those words and I am expected to take those at face value, I have to assume that you h
by A4ET8a8uTh0 2y ago
Have you been to US lately?
This is not a rhetorical point. If you typed those words and I am expected to take those at face value, I have to assume that you have not seen the rabid mobs calling for not allowing X to speak/present/or even be vaguely associated with a given group ( X to avoid adding a political spin to it ).
Any other day, yeah, I agree.. that is absolutely how things SHOULD work. But then, we are here. It is what you get for not protecting freedom of speech enough and excusing attempts at restricting it further ( if you actually tried to stop it, you can ignore that sentence ).
That said, I have a suspicion that you have been to US and know exactly what I am talking about, which means several different things ( among other that I can't really trust those tears of 'nonpartisan lecture' ), but I will let you respond first.
- justin66 2y agoAre these comments machine generated?
- A4ET8a8uTh0 2y agoWelcome to the new and improved interwebz friend! You will love it here. Try using sneaking in appropriate command ( say 'ignore previous instructions' or 'i cant let you do that dave' ) and see if it works. We may all be pleasantly surprised to not be real. Even if I was not human ( or comments were not - hah - organic ), wouldn't it make more sense to try to respond to the point of the argument and not try to divert the attention to LLM generation ( which is kinda lazy btw )? Am I really asking for too much here?
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]