A12-B

8 ms·

31.
by A12-B 6y ago
The reality is humans wouldn't believe the AI. They'd spend literal centuries arguing that the AI's parameters were wrong or the training data was bad if it meant they could protect their financial interests.
32.
by A12-B 6y ago
It's pretty easy, actually. You make a website with whoisguard enabled, you sign your writing with a fake name, and you decline interview requests. Bonus points if you pretend to be a different gender, like JK Rowling did. Often times
33.
by A12-B 6y ago
I am for evidence-based regulation, not picking and choosing which regulation is good or bad based on your own broken philosophy, or whether it is good for your business.
34.
by A12-B 6y ago
Wow, Maybe things were different in 2001 but saying there's no career in graphics sounds ridiculous today. It's also one of the coolest fields.
35.
by A12-B 6y ago
Elon Musk making the move to Texas specifically to avoid the regulation that would have helped stop this from happening, would be kicking himself right now if he was in any way affected by this or consistent in his beliefs.
36.
by A12-B 6y ago
Why do you assume this is about making the school look bad, and not that there might be some serious issue if black/hispanic people are not performing as well as others. They are launching an investigation into the matter, not removing
37.
by A12-B 6y ago
This headline will receive a lot of backlash from the anti-woke crowd, but it's a pretty fair assessment in substance. They identified a glaring issue, that most kids in the advanced classes are white and asian, despite the district be
38.
by A12-B 6y ago
If there's money to be made, you can guarantee someone has a bot to capitalise on it. Doesn't matter if it's stocks, domain names, or ecommerce, there's a bot out there doing most of the work.
39.
by A12-B 6y ago
This is a theoretically more pure solution because you are trying to break down compatibility to its common factors, the processor, and then do as little work as possible to get it to the point of portability. Less abstraction than other so
40.
by A12-B 6y ago
What happens when intel goes bust and we all have to switch to new processors
41.
by A12-B 6y ago
The core of the issue is that people don't believe a company that big would break the law so easily. In reality it's the opposite: When you're that big breaking the law becomes really easy because you have the strongest legal
42.
by A12-B 6y ago
When you break a law, you don't immediately go to jail. Its not a video game. There are about a million dollars and hurdles in the way of suing amazon for breaking labour laws. They are engaging in far more than just informing their em
43.
by A12-B 6y ago
They are quite literally not within their right to stop unionisation, as that is illegal. Also it looks bad because it is bad. btw, the line between 'disincentivising' and 'forcing' is decided arbitrarily by you. If they
44.
by A12-B 6y ago
They don't let you buy dogecoin. I sleep.
45.
Lie detectors have always been suspect. AI has made the problem worse(technologyreview.com)
3 points by A12-B 6y ago|0 comments
46.
by A12-B 6y ago
The 3 ways to look at this are from a literal perspective, a legal perspective, and an 'artistic' perspective. Literally, this changes nothing. A copy is the same artwork as any other. Legally, having ownership (or partial) of art
47.
by A12-B 6y ago
NFT is to artwork what Bitcoin is to gold. That's the way I see it anyway.
48.
by A12-B 6y ago
It's about the psychology of it all. People now have a way to verify actual ownership of artwork. Whatever added value the work has is just a construction of our minds and is no different to adding value to physical artwork for arbitra
49.
by A12-B 6y ago
If you reduce NFT art down it is basically just a way to make digital art work like physical art. It didn't work that way before because you can copy anything digital, but the use of crypto + proof that you own the work adds that uniqu
50.
by A12-B 6y ago
This is how it works in all browsers and is useful because more people on average will click the url to remove all the text so they can type something new
51.
by A12-B 6y ago
Not that I don't believe that, but where's the proof?
52.
by A12-B 6y ago
I'm sorry I wasn't around, could you please explain why?
53.
by A12-B 6y ago
This assumes the story is even true. If it doesn't seem like a rational thing to do under the pretence of it being true, then shouldn't you assume it's false?
54.
by A12-B 6y ago
Seems like most of the government and top level executives do. Most people in those positions are from Ivy leagues, and in this world those are the positions it really matters to be in.
55.
by A12-B 6y ago
Lol, I'm sure every single person in the class action suit agreed to the settlement, and otherwise would be able to afford to sue them again. Right. Settlements are decided by a single class representative, and other class members are
56.
by A12-B 6y ago
Who is making 125k p/y that needs a second job??
57.
by A12-B 6y ago
"Work from home Be your own boss Set your own schedule" I've heard this one before. Next you'll get the state of california to classify me as an employee.
58.
by A12-B 6y ago
Ironically, whoever answers the question probably wont be paid trillions of dollars. That is because the most likely answer to the question is that it is not sustainable, meaning there's two options: we switch to a non-capital system,
59.
by A12-B 6y ago
Thanks for the pre-school analogy, but I still think it is wrong for one person to control 100b dollars of assets/wealth. Someone being a founder doesn't really translate to any meaningful explanation of why they should have this
60.
by A12-B 6y ago
He didn't put in work worth 100b dollars.

More ›