946789987649

10 ms·

31.
by 946789987649 1y ago
When I was at university, I went to a talk from a security researcher who found this was the case with credit cards.
32.
by 946789987649 1y ago
I didn't know places still had quarterly releases. That seems to like the one to resolve rather than a mono repo.
33.
by 946789987649 1y ago
Yeah agreed - does anyone really care for $4/month?
34.
by 946789987649 2y ago
You could say the same about Google, where there's an entire generation who no longer needed to trawl through encyclopedias to find relevant information. I think we're doing just fine.
35.
by 946789987649 2y ago
I think the question is why rather than physically how. Surely that amount of tabs is useless because you'll have duplicates, irrelevant things, etc.
36.
by 946789987649 2y ago
I've had a few people chuck the entire problem into ChatGPT, it was still very much useful in a few ways: - You get to see how they then review the generated code, do they spot potential edge cases which the AI missed? - When I ask the
37.
by 946789987649 2y ago
What do you do if a junior asks for help and it's easiest to code through with them?
38.
by 946789987649 2y ago
Going through our pre-seed round atm and it is incredibly frustrating. I haven't raised in the US so it may be similar there, but the amount of time wasted for a relatively small amount of money is painful. I'm also not sure what
39.
by 946789987649 2y ago
You could argue similar for US/UK, but I would still rather live in the UK.
40.
by 946789987649 2y ago
Not sure how you gleaned that it was lower quality from my post? You can move fast and still do things well if you set it up correctly at the start. Specifically with things like automated testing and so on.
41.
by 946789987649 2y ago
I've always been a backend developer, but started my own company about a year ago. From that, I had to become full stack and AI has helped dramatically with the learning and implementation. There's a lot of things which would have
42.
by 946789987649 2y ago
Bugs and infrastructure are two different things. Yes when a game first launches it will potentially be quite buggy, but every expansion until recently has been impressively slick.
43.
by 946789987649 2y ago
Even World of Warcraft which used to be seamless in terms of issues, has had increasingly more and more obvious bugs. A sad state from the "Blizzard polish" of yesteryear.
44.
by 946789987649 2y ago
Of course people forget things, but as the other commenter mentioned, I think you are bringing unnecessary logic to what is an emotional subject and response. Which as they say, makes you come across as a jerk while bringing no value to the
45.
by 946789987649 2y ago
I had a manager do something like this but in a slightly better way. Each week we took it in turns doing our "life story". Some did it funny, some did it really personal and serious, some more of a CV, and some a mix of them all.
46.
by 946789987649 2y ago
Sounds a bit like plastic surgery... you only notice the bad ones.
47.
by 946789987649 2y ago
accidentally hitting each other
48.
by 946789987649 2y ago
You could argue the same for timezones in a date library, yet they have them. I would think a library dedicated to money will in fact be the most up to date.
49.
by 946789987649 2y ago
Even as a one person developer, you inevitably need to come back to old code and understand what's happening. Types help with that. The size of the team or codebase is irrelevant.
50.
by 946789987649 2y ago
It can be even better - in the UK unless you earn over a large amount, or know for a fact you have some special circumstances, you never have to do a thing.
51.
by 946789987649 3y ago
We had something similar at an old job. It was pretty nice as then you were allowed to release your changes whenever as long as all the changes up to yours had been tested.
52.
by 946789987649 3y ago
> You'll get diluted, replaced and kicked out the moment traction starts gaining. This is just straight up wrong. You don't HAVE to enter the VC cycle of endless raising, and if they're wanting to replace/kick you out
53.
by 946789987649 3y ago
> Jooq isn't bad, but it's not SQL, it's Java trying to be SQL. Can you elaborate on this? I have been using JOOQ for years (with Kotlin), and I have never had any issues with it "trying to be SQL".
54.
by 946789987649 3y ago
That's a pretty short journey (probably about 15 minutes), but yes it will definitely be a lot better now. I think also part of it comes down to 1. getting used to it, and 2. the time you cycle at. Rush hour, while more hectic, actuall
55.
by 946789987649 3y ago
We already have people editing videos anyway, you never see the first cut. AI-matically removing umms is really just speeding up that process.
56.
by 946789987649 3y ago
JOOQ is the only acceptable ORM.
57.
by 946789987649 3y ago
> the ability to view lyrics while listening to music You can still do that? Am I missing something?
58.
by 946789987649 3y ago
Is there a reason Linear can't be used by companies later than start up?
59.
by 946789987649 3y ago
Sounds like who you're targeting right? Big corps don't need generalists, start ups do.
60.
by 946789987649 3y ago
That page continues to just get worse and worse. Truly awful.

More ›