93po

13 ms·

181.
by 93po 1y ago
thanks!
182.
by 93po 1y ago
> Not really. Each of these conditions can be understood and described in terms of male and/or female sex development. The "spectrum" rhetoric obfuscates detail. im not sure i follow. you can have either XY and XX chromoso
183.
by 93po 1y ago
i appreciate you mentioning MIPS - i had no idea there was a new, better standard, and i'll definitely get one for my next helmet (motorcycle)
184.
by 93po 1y ago
if you're going to list the strengths of china, one of the biggest ones is unironically having leadership that doesnt get interrupted in massive ways every 4 years. i'm not going to debate the negative parts of that, clearly it is
185.
by 93po 1y ago
normalizing the offering and asking of pronouns, even if you're cisgender, is a good thing to do for people who do want to use different pronouns: 1. it shows that you're respectful of people's genders and you're a saf
186.
by 93po 1y ago
intersex people disagree, and i'm clearly talking about not identifying with the traits that society-at-large attributes to the sexes and not that you have a vagina but dont identify as having a vagina (which would also be valid but im
187.
by 93po 1y ago
alternatively: the security guard of the local mall left the door unlocked when the mall was actually closed, and i saw the mall hours that it was closed, but i went in anyway out of curiosity since i was already there
188.
by 93po 1y ago
let's be clear here, though: the root problem isn't someone finding some sensitive papers left on a printer accidentally, it's the person who left them on the printer to begin with. that's the root failure, and damage th
189.
by 93po 1y ago
This requires you to have any amount of respect for intellectual property, which many find to be immoral
190.
by 93po 1y ago
it doesn't seem like a hard concept. they're non-binary. they don't identify as either side of the biological sex spectrum and are therefore okay with any pronouns. it's also common in trans-accepting communities to pree
191.
by 93po 1y ago
would be cool if we didn' t reward companies with billions of dollars for offshoring production and labor to maximize profits at the expense of american jobs, and apparently, national security.
192.
by 93po 1y ago
Controlled opposition is absolutely a thing, and to think that people at trillion dollar companies wouldn't do this is naive. I'm not claiming for a fact that mozilla is controlled opposition, i'm just saying it's very
193.
by 93po 1y ago
When I see "reps from every browser agree" my bullshit alarm immediately goes off. Does it include unanimous support from browser projects that are either: 1. not trillion dollar tech companies or 2. not 99% funded from a trillion
194.
by 93po 1y ago
i think you're missing the point. imagine this: you're walking down a beautiful waterside bridge in kyoto during cherry blossom season. there's really delicious smelling grilled eel from the store next to you. there's a
195.
by 93po 1y ago
____ does good/poorly on HN is often repeated but usually never true. I see constant negativity on AI, and in fact I see it overwhelmingly more negative than positive takes. but i also have my own bias in what i see, and probably falli
196.
by 93po 1y ago
i'm positive spacex would be thrilled to launch something like a JWST and get to write off the $150-$220 million launch "value", which is what the Ariane 5 ECA costs. since it'd only cost them as low as $10 million with
197.
by 93po 1y ago
this is what we call a slippery slope fallacy there is no evidence that there will be a hot war, that it will involve destroying satellites, or the process of destroying the satellite would result in space junk that didn't naturally de
198.
by 93po 1y ago
You can tell that journalism is dead because they cite how much it's allegedly dropped in the past year with literally zero other info or context. Ok, dropped from what to what? How does this compare to other cities? Has it gone up con
199.
by 93po 1y ago
or just use https://hckrnews.com/
200.
by 93po 1y ago
thanks! i think i understand the nature of the job okay, i think its more my ability to realistically get there in 6-12 months is what i'm concerned about
201.
by 93po 1y ago
i think my hope is that interviews for ML engineering would focus on domain knowledge specific to ML and not intricate questions about using typescript and react, which is the sort of stuff i simply cannot bring myself to care about enough
202.
by 93po 1y ago
something these guides indirectly touch on but don't explain more explicitly: frequently issues with socializing are rooted in trauma, and working on that trauma is what's going to fundamentally improve socialization. and for thos
203.
by 93po 1y ago
it really bothers me when people try to assert people aren't actually neurodivergent/disabled because they dislike the person, and seem to want to further justify their dislike on a personal level instead of having compassion for
204.
by 93po 1y ago
if im a below average web developer of 15 years and wanted to transition to entry level ML/AI engineer of any sort, how much time would you guess it would take to become a competitive candidate if i worked at it full time? i'm int
205.
by 93po 1y ago
they would be break-even if all they did was serve existing models and got rid of everything related to R&D
206.
by 93po 1y ago
i disagree on this, people comment with stuff anyone could google all the time. its nice to see info without doing it myself, and esp when often i never would. however gpt-whatever is a bad choice for this bc its a very likely scenario to m
207.
by 93po 1y ago
yes it's nice of our overlords to not let us literally die in certain circumstances, even though organ transplants are sometimes denied by insurance for really fucked up, evil reasons
208.
by 93po 1y ago
its not difficult - it's that they very clearly HATE class consciousness. just look back at occupy wallstreet. it got coverage that was nearly universally mocking it and sneering at it, and the second they were able to ignore it and pr
209.
by 93po 1y ago
it doesnt really matter if there are bars of gold to backup the value of a company's market cap. the point is that you can sell the shares for money, and to further emphasize this, you're literally taxed on that gain just like inc
210.
by 93po 1y ago
i thought you meant budget cuts, of which there never has been as far as i can tell there was a 20% headcount reduction, down to a very meager 15,000 people. you dont believe the FDA can properly function with 15,000 employees?

More ›