93po

12 ms·

211.
by 93po 1y ago
in what way are human brains also not just predictors? our neural pathways are built and reinforced as we have repeated exposure to inputs through any of our senses. our brains are expert pattern-followers, to the point that is happens even
212.
by 93po 1y ago
i think the point is people assume models arent overfitting for it, and its a fun/silly way to potentially gauge its general abilities
213.
by 93po 1y ago
What cuts? I looked online and I don't see a single year that it's ever gone down
214.
by 93po 1y ago
People literally in this comment section are directly blaming trump I've not seen my claim repeated by literally anyone else on HN I disagree with your assertion that it's stupid, something you provide no evidence to support, this
215.
by 93po 1y ago
I've also seen info that i haven't verified that it seems to help with impulse control and executive functioning, so i imagine it would help reduce drug and alcohol consumption as well
216.
by 93po 1y ago
its been posted 4 times and users tend to flag things they dont think will incite curious or interesting conversation. i can virtually guarantee you that HN mods did not flag this also @ doesnt do anything i dont think, his email is easy to
217.
by 93po 1y ago
A really basic consideration of the situation gives us the very likely explanation. The idea that Trump was sitting at his desk and randomly pissed about the bottom 1/6th of Section 1 and was like "take that off congress's we
218.
by 93po 1y ago
Because really basic consideration of the situation gives us the very likely explanation. The idea that Trump was sitting at his desk and randomly pissed about the bottom 1/6th of Section 1 and was like "take that off congress&#x2
219.
by 93po 1y ago
i mean what do you call the US domineering nearly the entire world's trade with its massive military for the past nearly 100 years?
220.
by 93po 1y ago
housewife
221.
by 93po 1y ago
i meant more in 5 years when its significantly better
222.
by 93po 1y ago
isnt that what tariffs are for? there's something that rubs me wrong about the argument of "we need IP laws because otherwise someone else might do the same thing as us, but better, and we won't be able to compete"
223.
by 93po 1y ago
is it impossible for society to advance without IP laws? is capitalism a requirement for advancement?
224.
by 93po 1y ago
am i crazy for not caring if a company in a foreign country obtains trade secrets and manufactures the same thing? like we're all humans and we all want access to whatever it is they're building, it seems like more people building
225.
by 93po 1y ago
I wouldn't want to be a hollywood production studio or game developer right now.
226.
by 93po 1y ago
Is this capable of doing something, like, telling if someone is standing in a bathroom? Is it capable of determining if they're specifically in the shower? It sounds like this is based on weird snooping goals but it's just the exa
227.
by 93po 1y ago
I find it's either people being flippantly dismissive because it's something they've decided to make part of their personality and refuse to consume any information that may challenge their opinion, or they just massively lac
228.
by 93po 1y ago
treasuries are overwhelmingly impacted by federal reserve policy, not sure why you think trump would have much to do with it. if you compare US vs european treasuries since 2016 it's sort of a wash - the european ones are barely outper
229.
by 93po 1y ago
if we're going to point to this there are much much more problematic instances of this happening, in particular democratic pressure to platforms like twitter and facebook to suppress certain information as "disinformation" ev
230.
by 93po 1y ago
guessing it was autocorrect issue :)
231.
by 93po 1y ago
I am also really annoyed when people repeat that it's only 15% government funded or whatever. It's a misrepresentation to the point of lying. Which is further reinforced by: if it's only 15%, why are you having to shut down?
232.
by 93po 1y ago
I'm not sure what your original point was. Either it's that serving AI as a business model is impossible to run at a profit, which I easily demonstrated is not the case. If it's just serving the model, then yes, it works, a
233.
by 93po 1y ago
In 2024 they had a $5 billion loss. About $3b of that was training. $1.5b was employees. I'm sure there's at least another $0.5b of costs associated to building out rather than just serving inference. In reality it's probably
234.
by 93po 1y ago
i tried this to see if i could get a discount and it just canceled it, lol. i wonder if its bc im a heavier user?
235.
by 93po 1y ago
i use privacy dot com cards to prevent this issue, takes 2 seconds to turn off the card in my extension
236.
by 93po 1y ago
OpenAI would be profitable if they stopped all investment and research and just sold their existing products. So this argument doesn't really match reality.
237.
by 93po 1y ago
how much did internet usage increase that year, in terms of the number of people and hours spent? what changes happened in the app ecosystem that had google as a default search provider? what other service offerings shut down or degraded th
238.
by 93po 1y ago
i read it the same way but i have no context to be confident in that reading
239.
by 93po 1y ago
i just wish these companies weren't led by sociopath liars is all
240.
by 93po 1y ago
source?

More ›