7Z7

9 ms·

31.
by 7Z7 8y ago
I'd be interested to know if a "full copy of the copyright laws" would fit in a standard email payload
32.
by 7Z7 8y ago
That seems even worse tbh. You are of course still downloading their content, but now you're also leaving out any money making possibilities the host site may have had in place. Even less likely to be considered "permitted".
33.
by 7Z7 8y ago
The scarcity is in the "quality" - its ability to move us in new and interesting ways, just like now. A trillion similar things are not very interesting, so quality stands out.
34.
by 7Z7 8y ago
"British accent" "Irish accent" "American accent" "Chinese accent"
35.
by 7Z7 8y ago
It's the money, not the acceptability
36.
by 7Z7 8y ago
>Plastics are aesthetically bad.. In many parts of the ocean we are way past aesthetics. 73% of Deep-Sea Fish Have Ingested Plastic: > https://www.ecowatch.com/plastics-deep-sea-fish-2536726086.h... Whale Died Of Star
37.
by 7Z7 8y ago
Do you mean "often short for China the country"? Because otherwise it does sound pretty weird for you to say "Chinese communist".
38.
by 7Z7 8y ago
>if you tried to say that people's needs have radically changed in that time then I fail to see how. Their needs have changed, because their expectations have changed. 20 years ago I didn't expect my map to be able to ask my ca
39.
by 7Z7 8y ago
Its not about being blocked from continuing, it's about having to answer questions (or click away the dialogues) to peruse content. And the "subscribe to our newsletter" overlay often does block progress without hunting for t
40.
by 7Z7 8y ago
Those are both already horrible UXs that are abused in the same way the "subscribe to our newsletter" is. I won't ever do any of those three for 99.9% of websites I visit, and yet 70% are requesting it. They've become us
41.
by 7Z7 9y ago
Then it looks like it was a mistake in the name registration process, because @Mat is listed in Google's cache going back to mid last year. You shouldn't have been able to register that name.
42.
by 7Z7 9y ago
How recently?
43.
by 7Z7 9y ago
Are you on Android?
44.
by 7Z7 9y ago
Came here to comment exactly this. The expression on the face is expressing all the wrong messages about the service.
45.
by 7Z7 9y ago
You don't have a "European" perspective. You have a wherever-you-are-from perspective, and potentially a whatever-you-choose-to-see one too. I'm from Ireland, we have noisy violent junkies, amongst others less noisy and
46.
by 7Z7 9y ago
Income is taxed
47.
by 7Z7 9y ago
In some contexts, yes.
48.
by 7Z7 9y ago
iOS has a software back-link when you follow a link or notification out of another app. And FWIW I (and I presume others) like getting notifications when I'm in other apps.
49.
by 7Z7 9y ago
>I would teach your children the value of not caring what other people think That's not a great lesson if taken absolutely. Other people can give valuable feedback to social interactions. You should be aware of what people think, an
50.
by 7Z7 9y ago
I understood it to mean that a boy child would be doubly thrilled getting to do things that his dad does. Though I'm not sure it's as clearly true in my experience (daddy's girl/mammy's boy, and all that).
51.
by 7Z7 9y ago
Be able to make a brain, hopefully means being able to make a better brain - or even, to make our brains better.
52.
by 7Z7 9y ago
>fancy You don't need this part. Per the article, it is a brand the author knows and has used reliably in the past, and has some knowledge of - you don't need to belittle his choices as fanboyism.
53.
by 7Z7 9y ago
I think you might be. The "in" at the end makes it pretty unambiguous.
54.
by 7Z7 9y ago
>For spies, spooks, government agents etc. I suspect that Face ID would always be a no-no as it is much harder to control the ability of others to eavesdrop.
55.
by 7Z7 9y ago
Actually, and this might be different where you live, but it's my understanding that shops don't really make any profit on cigarettes/alcohol/lottery tickets, and that they are only sold to entice you to buy other things
56.
by 7Z7 9y ago
I don't think your comment was designed to criticise Muslims, but I think you did a sloppy job making your point, and equivocated (maybe accidentally) the wrong sets and members. Charitably, your comment reads that people who call them
57.
by 7Z7 9y ago
> If you were to apply what you are advocating for fairly, then every Muslims would be arrested in the US. No. Just no. Islamists =/= Muslims The honest comparison would be to ask if anyone who professes to be a member of Al Qaeda o
58.
by 7Z7 9y ago
>When a muslim plows into a crowd it's a lone wolf and we should jump to conclusions That is literally the opposite of the actual media narrative associated with Muslims, and is often held out as the difference in coverage between M
59.
by 7Z7 9y ago
Have you used a Keurig? Or Nespresso?
60.
by 7Z7 9y ago
It worries me that this is a legitimate question. The chief of the military does not define law.

More ›