76rp

4 ms·

1.
by 76rp 6mo ago
https://github.com/Euro-Office/server/commit/90a473b99f8ca7b...
2.
by 76rp 6mo ago
The license says: > you must retain the original Product logo when distributing the program I understand "retain" in the way that you have to display the logo anywhere where the original OnlyOffice displays it. So I think you a
3.
by 76rp 6mo ago
I agree with the posters above that OnlyOffice conflates retaining branding with retaining attribution. However, AGPL doesn't require retaining attributions other than copyright notices by default. Under section 7b, the copyright holde
4.
by 76rp 6mo ago
> Sometimes I think the EU is ran by idiots, other times I am certain they are a bunch of idiots. Is Euro-Office funded by the EU? I don't think the EU has anything to do with this project. ---- https://github.com/Eu
5.
'Euro-Office': OnlyOffice accuses of license violations(heise.de)
10 points by 76rp 6mo ago|1 comments
6.
by 76rp 6mo ago
https://www.onlyoffice.com/blog/2026/03/interview-with-lev-b... > But to our great regret, we discovered that they removed all references to our brand/attribute as required by our license. Where does
7.
by 76rp 6mo ago
https://www.onlyoffice.com/blog/2026/03/onlyoffice-flags-lic...
8.
by 76rp 6mo ago
From the general user's point-of-view: Using OnlyOffice's paid products may be problematic because of sanctions against Russia. From a contributor point-of-view: If I voluntarily contributed to OnlyOffice, I would be unhappy that
9.
by 76rp 6mo ago
It has been alleged that the company behind OnlyOffice is selling a modified version (P7/R7 Office) is Russia. These allegations aren't completely meritless. For example, a commit to a third-party (?) P7-Office-plugin repo is ti
10.
by 76rp 6mo ago
I wonder if this is kosher: https://github.com/Euro-Office/core/commit/e452acebeb3433895... On the one hand, the authors of AGPL certainly didn't intend the "Additional Terms" to be a means to