7532yahoogmail

11 ms·

61.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Your rant + some good points to be sure reminds me of a long running argument I had with an ex-detroit guy on who the mororns and/or cheaters were: Detroit or Japan? -- this was mid 80s and early 90s. Hint: some American companies are
62.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
How does the Japanese of the 80s and early 90s (before their problems recently) differ from now? JP took some 30pct of the US market in an industry that is/was largely beholden to the same constraints you mention. Honda and Toyota we&#
63.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
One thing I question is the assessment that what's under the hood is unimportant to the customer ... Now many guys and most wives surely don't care unlike a mechanical engineer until it doesn't work. In the early 90s Japanese
64.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
You forgot to read the PDF
65.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Agree. In the US it makes sense to eliminate cars; consumers have voted for SUVs. I guess Detroit will need EV SUVs. I find pharma's roic and ebita suspiciously high; pivot to healthcare cost inflation. And I am surprised by retail num
66.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Great post. This is why I love hacker news
67.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Guantanamo un-American. I do not support it. Presidents including Obama have tried to close it. Congress - the absolute worst of the three Federal branches - has stopped it. It's another problem in a whole line of problems their inabil
68.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Umm ... When will pb allow me to decode a field in buffer without having to decode the entire object in the buffer? I'm talking a field in a pb message NOT a byte stream I hand encoded without reference to a message eg more like flat b
69.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
But the protoc compiler already makes data structure definitions in the target, client language. So what's the point of a parallel macro system? Either it's a subset of capability of what protoc does or equal. Former questionable;
70.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Look, there is an essential difference between what is an engineer and what is a technical person. The later want direction, projects broken into epics and then stories, and wants steps. Engineers can make that structure and work better in
71.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Nicely done and explained.
72.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Title needs a rate ... 350k requests/month. Ok: the rest of the article was great. Thanks
73.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
If only the OP would have used one more flowerly, sales, marketing, adjective, or emotive word then I would have succumbed to his charm. One more is all we're asking for. But alas this piece is a bunch of cheap symbolism. Op whatever i
74.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Best back handed compliment I've seen in a while ... And right too.
75.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
I'm c/c++ over 20 years, go 1 year, Python 5+ years. I work at a company with a guy on the c++ standards committee with the internal sdlc and engineering training for large scale, commercial systems to boot. This article is a rant
76.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Like the thought. And list.
77.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
(Repost & from 2019).
78.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
I am laughing ... Laughing my b u double t off at this. In 2019 I spent too many hours debating crypto as currency replacement or substitute. Never bought it. But this is like m.pythons+galaxy hitch hiker+pink-panther level of crazy dumb.
79.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Thank you for the perspective. Now when we talk machine learning are we talking: L. Pachter and B. Sturmfels. Algebraic Statistics for Computational Biology. Cambridge University Press 2005. G. Pistone, E. Riccomango, H. P. Wynn. Algebraic
80.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
This article does not read like cogent CDC advice. It seems written in a more page-6 OP-ED style. Not sure this is the perspective we need.
81.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
This topic is surely worth a lot more discussion. It's a systemic pronlem that needs a systemic solution. I would heartily recommend "The Human Element" by Schutz. in this regards. It's worth reading because of its simpl
82.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Right. Good explanation
83.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
You'd be giving money to the company if the shares actually came from them. If you're buying on an exchange ... you're exchanging cash for shares with the counterparty almost never ever the company itself. The company is not
84.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Threads and events are duals. So it is possible to do both well if, in the threads case, the implementation is done right. The author makes the case he's done implementations well. The salient question then is: can the average programm
85.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Thank you for suggestions
86.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Dear OP: here's some career advice: you're not thinking right or doing right if you can't figure this out for yourself. Just like I've said on reddit's lpt form reality is you gotta figure it out for yourself and st
87.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
No, that's a simple throw away response
88.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
To further clarify all I need is a system to: - ask for task heartbeat - make sure nodes in cluster pingable - run N copies of task on reachable hosts That's it.
89.
Ask HN: Simple cluster self-healing system?
2 points by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago|6 comments
90.
by 7532yahoogmail 7y ago
Agree!

More ›