6thbit

7 ms·

91.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
I find it a good surprise. Signals they probably don't want to become an advertising company, which is what every other tech business ended up becoming. And that is not against having ads be a core revenue driver, like for companies in
92.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
Google did just fine with the same strategy on search.
93.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
So John gets to announce the Fold comes september
94.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
The binary diff?
95.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
Yes I think this is an appropriate view today. My only caveat would be that in some security fixes, the pure code delta, is not always indicative of the full exploit method. But LLMs could interpolate from there depending on context.
96.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
No. You operate AS IF they know your location. In other words, it becomes part of your threat model.
97.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
They can route between models but you pay the standard rate for whichever model is selected (plus 5% fee). Afaik all current model providers have fixed prices per tokens which don't vary depending on, say, demand or hardware availabili
98.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
this is exactly how the other side feels
99.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
i got shivers thinking about a future ai dynamic pricing and automatic gateway choosing the cheapest provider available
100.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
don’t attach to a single AI provider when you can attach to cloudflare as your single AI gateway provider! rant aside, they are greatly positioned network wise to offer this service, i wonder about their princing and potential markup on top
101.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
the beauty of wikipedia as dns is its easy access, are there similarly easily accessible uncensorable ways?
102.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
Great PR piece by Strix, but I find mixed messages. Cal.com folks are getting a red team for free, wouldn't that further convince them their closed source software is strong enough? Isn't Strix's business companies paying for
103.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
who updates wikipedia with the new domains? how do they know the new ones?
104.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
300M come from: Statutory damages for circumvention of a technological measure for 120,000 music files 22M come from: Statutory damages for willful copyright infringement for 148 sound recordings from Sony, Warner and UMG. Why is it only 1
105.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
Exactly yes, and that is insecure here because the app relayed the message beyond its layer and ownership. Thus not making the app the end of the communication.
106.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
So this is where we find out the one end of e2e is the phone and not the app. Semi-related, in whatsapp reading the text in the notification doesn't mark the message as read, so the OS is kinda mitm here.
107.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
i like the efforts behind sigstore.dev project. And while I do think code signing alone would’ve helped in the recent issues, what I’d like to see is a sort of automated package scanner that searches for this kind of malware and then publis
108.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
NYT has more than enough bandwidth and process to vet every ad they run, which must be in the order of 10s or 100s. Meta runs ads in the order of hundreds of thousands or millions, and constantly allows very questionable things.
109.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
Thought it was clickbait/circumstantial but they are quoting an actual spokesperson saying they are doing it on purpose !! > "We're actively defending ourselves against these lawsuits and are removing ads that attempt to r
110.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
So what's the current data centers footprint in Maine? Does the move benefit companies with existing DCs whose competition can no longer establish a region there?
111.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
I'm good with my Iosevka ExtraLight with iTerm2's thin strokes enabled. But the bitmaps do make me nostalgic, maybe useful to read my own old code and cringe a little less.
112.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
Any chance they keep an RSS?
113.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
that's such a loaded statement.
114.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
I thought Codex at least already can handle interactive sessions of programs, e.g. GDB.
115.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
non-zero already existing companies can afford to compete, so its not a great preliminary line of defense against your main enemies. If the existing competition's turn around time to out-benchmark you is in the order of weeks, its an a
116.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
Calling squash stupid sounds like a case of Dunning-Kruger. If you've worked on a large team without squashing and without increasing frustration I'd be greatly interested to hear about it.
117.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
Now we have to wonder if they ran Mythos on their Calude source and it missed it or why they chose not to run it. I do agree and wonder why that's not marked as security. In their security page [0] it says: > Since exploitabili
118.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
This seems to be the mind-games play. FOMO at the moment, if they push it successfully you could even be labeled negligent for not paying them for it.
119.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
It's only a moat if you believe no competing lab will achieve similar or better results in a large enough time frame to profit from it.
120.
by 6thbit 6mo ago
This is silly and disingenuous. In a matter of days or weeks a competing lab will make public a model with capabilities beyond this “mythos” one. Is this a huge fear-driven marketing stunt to get governments and corporations into dealing w

More ›