5555watch

5 ms·

1.
by 5555watch 7d ago
GPTZero says: "We are highly confident this text was AI generated (100%)" Am I the only one that's tired of "my random shower thought turned into full article with AI" articles?
2.
by 5555watch 7d ago
Would be interesting to see Speedometer 3.1 tests as well. I find they translate really well to user experience, and previously the M5 Base was beating the equivalent Ryzen/Intel there as well.
3.
by 5555watch 11d ago
Not that many years ago (maybe 2012-2014), we were taught working with R using only the base-R. Its' native script editor was a Windows Notepad or something equivalent. We used this for years.. Professors as well. For some reason we di
4.
by 5555watch 11d ago
Do you have a good textbook to reference to where the theory starts from PAC-Bayes?
5.
by 5555watch 12d ago
Another useful link [0], page 91. Effectively, the more complex the solution, the heavier is the upper bound on true risk. It doesn't mean a simpler model is necessarily better. But the complexity brings its own larger support for mist
6.
by 5555watch 14d ago
Recalling their recent misuse report [0], I kind of agree with them. And performance/intelligence wise I think we are already at quite a nice local optima. [0]: https://www.anthropic.com/threat-intelligence-report-septe
7.
by 5555watch 16d ago
This reminded me of anecdotes of people discussing with friends about buying a random specific item, and then suddenly seeing it advertised everywhere before even googling about it. Next step, discussing your Navier Stokes solutions with fr
8.
OpenAI puts Pro subscriptions on hold due to Astra demand(techcrunch.com)
7 points by 5555watch 16d ago|0 comments
9.
by 5555watch 16d ago
At least in my experience, the issue with ArXiv is that the expectation is that the draft should be already in a good enough state. And polishing plus writing the meat around the main result can take a lot of time
10.
by 5555watch 16d ago
Does it make sense to start privately and then open the repo after publication? Will the dates be retained? Also, isn't commit history easy to spoof?
11.
by 5555watch 16d ago
Is there an alternative link without certificate issues?
12.
by 5555watch 16d ago
I also think that it's quite a bad PR for them, is it really worth the Millenium prize? Is it not enough that top mathematicians are already actively using these tools? In the long term this would lead to potentially profitable collabo
13.
by 5555watch 16d ago
The ultimate drive for some researches is the pursuit of knowledge. If I'm stuck at some block which prevents me from continuing in some direction that I want, of course I would like some help. I believe we already have nonzero collabo
14.
by 5555watch 17d ago
Or, if you're using, you need to push a pre-print relatively soon after AI help.
15.
by 5555watch 18d ago
Maybe a dumb observation, but if a chain of people were working on the problem for a long time, it's not difficult to imagine that someone accidentally prompted a model with their personal or some other account without the privacy set
16.
by 5555watch 23d ago
Citing Tibo [0]: " - Bigger number = Better - Bigger celestial object = Better and the scale is Astra > Sol > Terra > Luna. " [0]: https://x.com/thsottiaux/status/2095600295808283073
17.
by 5555watch 23d ago
Many other links are also 404'ing, so probably internal issues. https://openai.com/index/legora-financial-statement-review-w... https://openai.com/index/playco-game-prototyping-with-astra&#x2F
18.
by 5555watch 23d ago
Probably this complexity was needed to beat all those benchmarks.. While I hate the code it produces, and the overwhelming documentation, I really enjoy how sometimes it's able to keep trying new things and testing, till it finds somet
19.
by 5555watch 25d ago
It means the questions including their answers are dependent. Ie, theres a data generating process for them, that the model uncovers. Like a KNN is known to have near Bayes accuracy as k/n to 0, n to infty, k to infty. The data reveals
20.
by 5555watch 25d ago
It makes sense. Even if it finds some exploit on your own code, who's to say you can't reuse the same exploit on some other system?
21.
by 5555watch 25d ago
While I can't speak for everyone in academia, I personally don't feel comfortable in putting my research questions and outputs to a private website, before the idea is at least arxived. Especially as all the Fable/Mythos prom
22.
by 5555watch 25d ago
Is Fable 5.1 still actively downthrottling the reasoning when questions relate to frontier ML questions, like it did with 5.0?
23.
by 5555watch 26d ago
It's not clear to me why isn't the 5.6 Sol Pro available on Codex. Maybe due to the high computational demands and slow speed. But as an anecdote, once when the Sol Ultra models were stumped on one problem, I gave the full extende
24.
by 5555watch 1mo ago
I can't be the only one that scrolls past quickly the whatever Google-AI spurts out. If I wanted to ask an AI - I would. But I've learned that they hallucinate stuff with numbers or anything that's time sensitive/recent
25.
by 5555watch 1mo ago
>Everyone should occasionally go back to the old models to see how much worse they were, like even a year ago you could generate results but they were typically full of bugs Oh yeah, I'm still amazed how good the current iteration o
26.
by 5555watch 1mo ago
All of your use cases are very advanced. I recently used it at grocery stores in a foreign country. Photographed the whole aisle and told it to find Y (detergent, softener, glue, sour cream, whatever), at the same time recommend the best Y
27.
by 5555watch 2mo ago
But the words don't really matter, do they? The model thought "user said believe in yourself, it means they want me to continue".. AI did a fixed amount of guesses, didn't yield anything. It probably documented the tries
28.
by 5555watch 2mo ago
PCA is good, but you could also try playing around with Sparse (robust) PCA. The sparsification loses orthogonality, but does not necessarily lose information, it can yield a different rotation and cleaner vectors. Now whether that matters
29.
by 5555watch 2mo ago
Even for consumers.. Every enthusiast now wants those specced out rigs to play with LLMs. Make a nice chip for that, and it will reduce some pressure on consumer RAM demand
30.
by 5555watch 2mo ago
Is it still true? I'd assume you should be able to freeze the matrix and unfreeze an expert block, before feeding particularly chosen training data. Or that doesn't work?

More ›