4iuvosvjf23

4 ms·

1.
by 4iuvosvjf23 2y ago
No kids right?
2.
by 4iuvosvjf23 3y ago
Presumably the union should calibrate its demands to the point where the cost to the employer is lower than the cost of replacing the workers but higher than what they get without the union. Surely there is some room there. If the cost of l
3.
by 4iuvosvjf23 3y ago
How is that a stretch? If we're not irreplaceable then ganging up on our employers is a way for us to reclaim some of the leverage in this transaction that we lose by being replaceable.
4.
by 4iuvosvjf23 3y ago
Thanks for the suggestion! I've started looking a little into the global remote thing and it sounds amazing. Would probably take me a while to get into such a position because I'm very junior still but it's something to aim f
5.
by 4iuvosvjf23 3y ago
I'm seriously thinking about this as well because I look at my future in America and see very few options but car-dependent atomized misery and I'm terrified of it. I just can't go back to the crushing boredom that characteri
6.
by 4iuvosvjf23 3y ago
As someone who has become increasingly bitter about and alienated from the American lifestyle because of this issue, this comment made my day. Brutal, biting, hilarious. Thanks for writing it.
7.
by 4iuvosvjf23 4y ago
They don't even need to say that though, just present some evidence to make me believe this is something other than an arbitrary management cultural preference and I'll feel much less imposed upon and bitter about it.
8.
by 4iuvosvjf23 4y ago
If there's data supporting RTO then why do they justify it with vague appeals to "company culture" and "watercooler moments" rather than just explaining the data?