Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
48terry
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
61.
▲
by
48terry
11mo ago
> I'd say otherwise - it's a reach out to have a relationship. They HAD a relationship: it was 20 years of volunteer work. That relationship was broken by Mozilla's actions.
62.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Question: What makes LLMs well-suited for the task of poker compared to other approaches?
63.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
I think the post was just really bad, myself.
64.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
I have a better idea: random.randint(1,10)
65.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
You absolutely need to get an accessibility professional (one you pay, not try to crowdsource free labor) to review your site. Your site excludes disabled people from participating.
66.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
That was the joke.
67.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Yeah, like, there's straight-up photos of penises and vaginas and naked people of all sorts on Wikipedia. It absolutely should be considered a NSFW app.
68.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Would you agree the Wikipedia app should be marked NSFW? It also contains a whole lot of objectionable stuff, often with pictures.
69.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
You went from "the justification makes sense" to "actually they can do whatever they want neener neener" real fast.
70.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Wow, who would have thought it was that easy? Wonder why nobody has done this incredibly basic solution to AGI yet.
71.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
You really thought you had a post with this one huh. I have second-hand embarrassment for you.
72.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
...But you did fully intend to assign homework? Why are you even commenting, what are you adding?
73.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
The simple explanation for all this, along with the milquetoast replies kasey_junk gave you, is that to its acolytes, AI and LLMs cannot fail, only be failed. If it doesn't seem to work very well, it's because you're obviousl
74.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
> 50 years from now AI powered toys will be so ubiquitous and common to people, they will barely blink. If the other take is luddite, then what's this? Source: "dude trust me"?
75.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
[flagged]
76.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
> There may be benefits down the road, such as them remembering you kindly and helping you out in the future. This part sticks out to me because, in this article presumably about empathy, we couldn't help ourselves but to bring up &
77.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
> It's definitely not the easiest thing If only there was an easier way to "select" a character on a website instead of having to effin' handwrite it out on a separate app.
78.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
I don't want a good-faith workaround for a website hijacking my clipboard. I want the website and its developers to stop doing things that are stupid and wrong.
79.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
So very true, homie: Why didn't all the gambling addicts put their money into a Vanguard account instead? Are they stupid?
80.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
I buy a house to live in it, WTF are you buying one for?
81.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Me copying and pasting your post verbatim to put on my blog under my name: "I greatly enjoyed collaborating with arthurofbabylon on this piece."
82.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
> the writing doesn't seem to flow logically from one thought to another. Neither has most of the stuff Sam has said since basically the moment he started talking. It is possible, perhaps, that he is actually a very stupid person!
83.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
> Let's say one video pegs a top of the line Blackwell chip at 100% utilization for 10 minutes. Where do you get this from?
84.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
> At Branch, we spent weeks and over $5K just to get basic privacy compliance docs. Our attorneys charged hundreds per hour to essentially fill out forms about our data practices. The kicker? The policy didn't even cover our specifi
85.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
I want to share which tabs on this tabpanel are the most interesting for a friend of mine to read. How would you suggest I get their labels?
86.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Okay. Now: Imagine it's 2025: Cookbook: Open book, follow steps. New gadget from mult-billion dollar company: showcases on a live demonstration that it's a broken piece of crap that doesn't work. Like, are we forgetting that
87.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Yes, if we include a cost they didn't include, the cost would be different.
88.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Phew, thank goodness someone policed this HN comment's quip about a multi-billion dollar company. May I recommend a more ambitious target in your war on misinformation next?
89.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
You're finding it "hard to side" with a literal nonprofit charity getting bullied ruthlessly because something something SaaS not self-managed? My God, dude.
90.
▲
by
48terry
1y ago
Yeah, like, it's weird to wish for more details, because I'm sure Hack Club is wishing they also had more details right now! If they knew the what and why of it, it'd probably be in the post!
More ›