4512124672456

7 ms·

1.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
> As high profile as Musk is, something like that account is a real threat to his personal safety in my opinion. People who want to actually harm Elon Musk don't need that Twitter account to do so. I don't see how it is a threa
2.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
This whole article is about private information. The flight data is, as enough people already told you, not private information. For good reason.
3.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
> someone dares to say uncomfortable reality-based everyone-who-lives-outside-in-real-world heresies How is that applicable here? The poster they responded to simply claims something they most likely cant prove (and neither can you), el
4.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
> Then why do you get mad when China or the Middle East bans material they find objectionable? There is a difference between banning content that is objectively harmful (e.g. child porn) and banning content to control and suppress minori
5.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
> Just a few days ago Zuckerberg was discussing banning / suppressing discussion of the Hunter Biden laptop - https://nypost.com/2022/08/25/mark-zuckerberg-criticizes-twi ... The main problem is that y
6.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
People (or NPCs/bots, like you call them) downvote you because not only is it a bad take and does have questionable grammar, it's also full of misinformation. Let's take your first point for example. If I go on Fox News right
7.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
> Trustlessly With cryptocurrencies, you need to trust: * The exchanges (and other ramps for getting useful money into the system and out of the system) * The developers of the chain * The developers of the smart contracts * The develope
8.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
Inflation is not something central bankers use to rob people of money for their own enrichment.
9.
by 4512124672456 4y ago
It exists! https://store.steampowered.com/app/252870/PULSAR_Lost_Colony...
10.
by 4512124672456 5y ago
> The thing I think driving Bitcoin is that all the other assets that can absorb billions of dollars in liquidity are throughly manipulated. Bitcoin can be just as much manipulated, if not more, because there's barely any regulatory
11.
by 4512124672456 5y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock
12.
by 4512124672456 5y ago
> It's possible to be both rational and religious. Except the person who is religious will always have a limit to their rationality, because they choose "believe in magic" instead of "knowing and not knowing".
13.
by 4512124672456 5y ago
> It stands to reason that someone who is a part of a strong religious community would have a much better social life, support structure, and network. Remove "religious" from this sentence and it is still true. Now the question
14.
Lesson of ivermectin: meta-analyses based on summary data alone are unreliable(nature.com)
217 points by 4512124672456 5y ago|460 comments
15.
by 4512124672456 5y ago
This paper still includes the retracted and heavily flawed study of Elgazzar et al. and should therefore be taken with a grain of salt. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02081-w https://grftr.news&#
16.
by 4512124672456 5y ago
That still has nothing to do with alternative math, but teaching.
17.
by 4512124672456 5y ago
> It’s not. The ultimate success or failure of bitcoin will depend on how many people use it and what it’s used for. Bitcoin has already failed as money. Even most coiners admit that nowadays. > Distributed consensus in a zero trust e
18.
by 4512124672456 5y ago
Wow, this article is so right. Excuse me while I invest in <Coin named after meme based on another meme> with 1000%+ yield that comes from []. Tether? Never heard of it. Also, ignore the millions being lost in scams ( https:/&#x2