3rdgender

5 ms·

1.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
That author is entitled to his perception of women in the valley and being sexually attracted to women. If you don't like him, simply avoid hanging out with him. It seems a lot of men don't like him, either. Presumably they simply
2.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
Is it actually a bad thing if people who pay for it can get a good education? Shouldn't we rather at the other end of the ladder, people who can't pay, and see to it that they can get a good education?
3.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
You are wrong. Yes individuals are not always completely rational, but in the long run the rational action usually prevails. It's more like an evolutionary attractor.
4.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
So the Highway is doing them a a favor, by making the place affordable.
5.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
True AI would perhaps know the user well enough to know their intent (even Google already knows the user and perhaps even know they have a likelihood for a person being more interested in musicals or in maths). It could also actually unders
6.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
If somebody created true AI, they could create a search engine with it that is better than Google.
7.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
Unforunatately, the definition of violence is rather broad sometimes. Especially when such rules are in place.
8.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
You've described the typical gender science scandal. Except that it is usually the gender science that is disqualified.
9.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
Maybe the people living there should factor it into their decision for living there?
10.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
If that's the case, I don't think it is their fault. The tax collectors should then distribute the taxes they collected in a different way. Also, it stands to debate of the kids are forced to live in the pollution. While the artic
11.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
I think the argument that they should pay extra taxes for that specific road is very strange. I think in generally they pay fuel tax and maybe something on cars (don't know the US system), and in theory that should pay for the roads an
12.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
You could argue if roads should be paid for by the government, and I would be sympathetic to it. But you could at least make a case that roads benefit everyone (even people who don't drive buy the goods that trucks deliver via roads),
13.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
As for 1, I think it wouldn't be the fault of the drivers. They pay for using the roads. If the tax system isn't distributing it properly, how is it their fault? You could argue they don't pay enough, but there is no info abo
14.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
"Why is the school district paying for the pollution controls? Why aren’t the 120,000 vehicles that drive past the school every day paying for it?" Don't drivers pay taxes, which also go to the school district - so actually,
15.
by 3rdgender 8y ago
"The researchers compared those companies to firms with 25 to 34 employees that didn’t have to release their data" So they are comparing two different types of firms (with > 35 employees and between 25 and 34 employees): Doesn&