3np

72 ms·

901.
by 3np 3y ago
That backport seems to use a nonpublished patched fork of a library that got replaced in between though, so no bueno there.
902.
by 3np 3y ago
When was the last time you visited Türkiye? (You're right though, even if some people are being silly about that one)
903.
by 3np 3y ago
That's cost of living for 4 people, mind you: > The cost of living for a two-parent, two-child family The typical case is more likely single or DINK. Manage the money well, throw in a couple of bonuses and a favorable liquidity even
904.
by 3np 3y ago
The normal thing is to have integration test PRs and other CI actions (which may require access tokens to APIs, inherently or due to naive design) be defined by the incoming branch, creating a vector for an attacker to get access to privile
905.
by 3np 3y ago
And now you need to update from version 42 to 67 after not paying attention for 4 months because there's an emergency bugfix or crucial feature that you can't backport trivially. Have fun.
906.
by 3np 3y ago
This does not reflect my experience at all. 3/5 would not vote again.
907.
by 3np 3y ago
FWIW, I really can't do ortholinear. Maybe it's similar for you? I think it's just one of those things where you don't know until you try for a while. It's apparently right for some!
908.
by 3np 3y ago
Did it?
909.
by 3np 3y ago
I'm not sure if what you're looking for even exist today (as much as half of m1). Other than that, I think your choice is generally between consumer-focused ARM-based Chromebooks with MT Kompanio 1380 like Acer Spin 530 on on hand
910.
by 3np 3y ago
On an individual level: So what? I stopped giving a f. I'd rather do what I believe is right than earn another $100k a year at a certain point. If it gets to the point of being laid off, hey, maybe it's the nudge you needed to fin
911.
by 3np 3y ago
Example Arch AUR but similar for Nix, Guix, Gentoo, others: On first install: - read AUR file - audit build & patching framework - audit patches On upgrade: - review patch changes - treat upstream changes like you woul
912.
by 3np 3y ago
Quality deterioration is another. Youtube has certainly recoded archives many times. 10yo less viewed vids look like crap not necessarily because of the source material..
913.
by 3np 3y ago
It's good that you know and understand things at a deeper level. That should make you even better equipped to design simple interfaces that require as little depth of understanding as possible from the next person. Similarly I've
914.
by 3np 3y ago
I've done a lot of OoP and my opinion these days is that if the reader needs to understand polymorphism properly to understand your inheritance, it's too complex. (Exceptions exist, of course, like libraries inherently dealing wit
915.
by 3np 3y ago
NIP-57 is optional. It's implemented by clients using that functionality but not required per se. The same goes for NIP-52 [Calendar Events] and NIP-99 [Classified Listings]. Neither of those are "inherently baked into the network
916.
by 3np 3y ago
Domain expert, not tech expert
917.
by 3np 3y ago
On an individual level: So what? I stopped giving a f. I'd rather do what I believe is right than earn another $100k a year at a certain point. If it gets to the point of being laid off, hey, maybe it's the nudge you needed to fin
918.
by 3np 3y ago
Veilid is trying, at least https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37118124 https://veilid.com/defcon/talk/
919.
by 3np 3y ago
> > First, I want a replication strategy. Nostr messages get lost in time, and many of the clients end up just blasting an entire message history at your client. Because there's no clue in the protocol how messages are related ot
920.
by 3np 3y ago
No. That's just strawmanning a terrible implementation. Here's another less terrible one: Public certificates of ID issuers are what's stored on-chain. Individual users have their (potentially locally generated) DIDs cross-si
921.
by 3np 3y ago
> you have your identity tied to your Bitcoin public key. Uhm, where did you see that?
922.
by 3np 3y ago
No, your link shows that a majority of validators will not include certain transactions in a block. While problematic in itself, there is nothing around slashing other validators who do so, on their allotted blocks. Technically you can stil
923.
by 3np 3y ago
Oh hey David Schaum has entered the chat to shill their thing
924.
by 3np 3y ago
I really don't think there is such a thing as a moral obligation to sue, and/or to do so consistently.
925.
by 3np 3y ago
The argument isn't that everyone should have "full, unfettered free speech" but that ISPs should not be enforcers.
926.
by 3np 3y ago
One thing I think contributed that I've never seen mentioned: It's a lot easier to write unreadable Ruby than unreadable Python, especially if you consider novice readers. This affects maintenance and contributions to gems/py
927.
by 3np 3y ago
I've posted on this a few times. Rehashing[0]: > https://github.com/mozilla-services/syncserver/pull/294 > So basically they stopped running the older version themselves but don't consider the
928.
by 3np 3y ago
Why the CCP supports SciFi is can be detached from motivations of individual authors.
929.
by 3np 3y ago
While I think I'd agree with your argument for many projects out there (YAGNI), there are some cases where I think it makes sense. Consider a product or article catalogue with search/filtering/ordering/pagination. This i
930.
by 3np 3y ago
Not to be confused with the Waku protocol family. https://waku.org/

More ›