3g4o53g4o5

7 ms·

1.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
The foundation of illogical and harmful decisions, and violation of human or any kind of rights. Some may think that their sentience is more important then the others. So it is better to not have it at all.
2.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Meanwhile belief in human magic is a bigger problem. While AI generate text from something that it found on the Internet, well, human also do that and even with a astronomically smaller database. edit: what I originally mean > Some might
3.
China Builds Brain-Scale AI Model Using ExaFLOPS Supercomputer(tomshardware.com)
1 points by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago|0 comments
4.
Ask HN: Is scientific facts more important than scientific thinking?
2 points by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago|10 comments
5.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
No need because some one just said that consciousness is not a thing that can be measured, HA HA.
6.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
First prove that you have consciousness, then we can talk.
7.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
So you are talking about magic.
8.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Yup. And people always fails to think about such boundary cases. Like > Human can do math proof Human infant dont. > Human can see and hear things and interact with the environment. Obviously a certain amount of population is unable t
9.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
> computer, an element of intent or interpretation is needed; otherwise it's just a bunch of stuff doing what stuff does naturall I mean this violates nothing and I am completely confused why it is a concern. AI face recognizing cam
10.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Well, there is still random quantum behavior in a complete vacuum a.k.a. empty space according to quantum field theory's findings. So yes, empty space is a computer as long as you notice that physics law is doing math all the time.
11.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
The operation of adding and subtracting per se in classical computers also lacking these physical properties. If you use this as your counterargument, namely classical computer can compute without the inherent operation owning a physical pr
12.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Bascially your assumption is that something that looks and works like an Intel CPU carry out an operation, that can be called a computation, everything else is not. But sorry this is not the only method to "compute". You are limit
13.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Well. FYI, unitary transformation, creation and annihilation operator, etc.
14.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Thanks this is exactly what I am trying to say. We dont know exactly how the universe is doing or how the photons do to themselves, but by doing experiments, scientists figured out the law of computiation of this vague "universe comput
15.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Well since there is full of false assumptions, I just give you a name. @toshitaka_szk in twitter. A Japanese dude can translate languages of birds and successfully did some experiences on it. And he is kind of famous. And needless to say Hu
16.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
How is it not? Quantum Mechanics and quantum field theory applies everywhere except for the black holes. Human can even harness the power by building quantum computer by that. So here you tried to deny the exist of quantum computing paradi
17.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Is this a counterargument? You are denying facts and say something juat even contract with yourself. > Dolphin can understand sign language but dog dont. So ALL OF THEM do not speak. Do you mean this? It is the same as saying that you do
18.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Sorry but you always forgot that when you sleep your consciousness disappeared. Please take account for this fact. When all sensory shut down, really you feel nothing and of cos think nothing.
19.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
True. Quantum behavior is computing linear algebra ever since the Big Bang, and we came accross to discover this fact 15e9 years later.
20.
by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago
Not probably, it is a bias. Dolphin can speak, dog can speak, bird can speak too. There is nothing special about homo species except the only fact that we have more neurons in our head. Those "philosophers" love to claim that h
21.
Ask HN: Why are people still publishing bad math textbooks?
1 points by 3g4o53g4o5 4y ago|0 comments