Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
3am
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
331.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
I don't think it's pedantic. I read bootstrapped to being self-funded by either the founders money and/or cash flow.
332.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Fun digression late on a Wednesday :) The indeterminate form seems the most correct based on the analysis of the limit of f(x,y) = x^y as x approached zero from different paths. I had always thought of it more of an algebraic identity thing
333.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Felt it down to North Carolina.
334.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Worth it all for the subsection titled, "You are not a special snowflake"
335.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
As another commenter said, this is a pretty poor story to post here... most people here have a $/time utility that strongly favors time. But for people that invest the time in couponing (friending companies on facebook and getting high val
336.
▲
Descended From Apes, Acting Like Slime Molds
(businessweek.com)
1 points
by
3am
15y ago
|
0 comments
337.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
NASA merged it with Rackspace's Cloud Servers and now it's called OpenStack.
338.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
"Most likely, this is simply a reflection of me being an unread ignoramus in the grand schemes of complex dynamics — it is far, far, too obvious to be novel." Yes, but great visualization work. The author should contact a decent math depar
339.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
If you want to release an e-book with a little less overhead (and keep a large fraction of the proceeds) you could go with lulu.com or createspace.com
340.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
The article says that the system architecture existed for no other plausible purpose than altering the data, that exit polling supports that the data was altered, and that public employees were not allowed access to the data collection proc
341.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Sure. They should issue a $50/ share special dividend, and they'd still have enough left over to buy eBay. It's arrogant corporate behavior that's only being put up with while their growth rate is so high. Watch how quick the knives come
342.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/07/hacking-neighbor-fr...
343.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Almost as though history is repeating itself verbatim.
344.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
No harm, no foul. They really do exist, unfortunately.
345.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Looking forward to trying it out. Many, many thanks for providing such an excellent tool. I was writing automated tests before Selenium, and it has been a seismic change in browser automation. Between you guys, JMeter, and Robot there r
346.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
First, correctly written code can be bad practice. Regexes are a powerful tool, and have appropriate uses. I disagree this is one of those cases, but at -4 on my previous comment, I guess most don't agree. Second, I would bet the majorit
347.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
No, using regexes for this is terrible. I could write you a program that will parse html employing GOTOs, but it's been recognized as a bad programming practice. I'm not going to do your research for you, but this is not opinion, it's the
348.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Remember Google Fiber for Communities when you read this. I would be very concerned if I was a cable company. Google would probably be happy enough to give a la carte TV via Hulu and high speed internet for little/no profit as another ad
349.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
I agree with you so much that I wrote a substantially identical response to a sibling comment, with the exception being that I neglected to congratulate them on their success. Clearly what they are doing is working for them right now. I h
350.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Well.. I disagree, but I wouldn't have downvoted you because it's a fair point. It's a bad idea for developers to QA their own code for a number of reasons. 1) Developers have cognitive blinders, like everyone else. They might not test fo
351.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
I wouldn't advertise you don't have a QA team.
352.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
You are coming up with a blanket judgement based on a small subset of a post (and in my opinion, not interpreting it as the poster intended). It read to me like he was talking about production usage, not tinkering. Node.js is slower and m
353.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
An 'average weekend warrior' or people 'without programming experience' who are daunted by the complexity of Java should not be implementing server applications (see PSN security issues). They are complicated independent of the language, a
354.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Fair enough - I'll call it a failure of imagination for me, then. I saw a DSL that had a BDD syntax for javascript, and thought it was meant to be some form of testing tool. We all have our cognitive blinders :)
355.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
_THIS_ It's hard to dumb it down enough for a non-technical user to do anything useful (in which case their tests are frequently invalid in a functional sense even though they're syntactically valid). But by that point you've usually dumbe
356.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
No, I agree completely. My gripe is that the DSL is JS with a fluent interface. You need a DOM context in order to make JS work (unless I'm mistaken) which is why you have tests that drive the browser like Selenium. So you are going to wr
357.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
Cucumber is a BDD tool. That stands for Behavior Drive Design, which is what the 'when X expect Y' format is. It's intrinsically a testing tool, where the user acceptance tests are described in a BDD format. It's a subset of TDD.
358.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
I'm in QA - what niche does this fill for you? The reason that I ask is that usually DSLs and other user acceptance tools exist to allow non-programmers to design tests. That is why cucumber's Gherkin is not in a Ruby syntax, and why robot
359.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
With zero effort, I found this for you: http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110413005584.htm<b... ; "Junichi Matsumoto, acting head of Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s Nuclear Power & Plant Siting Division, acknowledged the seriousness
360.
▲
by
3am
15y ago
He doesn't seem like a very decent person based on his online conduct. I don't know why people take what he says seriously at all, he got lucky with Weblogs.com and hasn't done much to distinguish himself after that.
More ›