38kkdiu

4 ms·

1.
by 38kkdiu 9y ago
Looks very nice, although it always takes me a bit to figure out what they're talking about with these sorts of things because I have to remind myself that most ML/DL stuff is supervised. What I research is unsupervised. They kind
2.
by 38kkdiu 10y ago
Can you say a bit more about what you mean by "it's very dangerous with the amounts of noise"?
3.
by 38kkdiu 10y ago
A link to the actual paper: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v541/n7638/full/nature2... This method has actually been discussed for some time now, and I'm surprised the abstract wasn't
4.
by 38kkdiu 10y ago
The problem is that there's nothing unambiguously non-typographic about the design. If they had distorted the symbols so much that they were outside the realm of normal unicode characters, sure. But anyone with that font could reconstr
5.
by 38kkdiu 10y ago
Actually, that review just underscores a problem I have with modern design, which is a focus on aesthetic elegance and cleverness over real usability concerns. I love design, so I'm not meaning to bash design per se, but every field ha
6.
by 38kkdiu 10y ago
Damn, thank you for that link. Satisfying to see what's on my mind so much lately on the page. The article and actual paper being discussed were both fascinating and satisfying to me. Predictably, maybe, the paper is a lot more than th
7.
by 38kkdiu 10y ago
I agree with others that everything has always been post-fact in a certain sense. The real problem now is that opinions and attitudes are being driven so much by ideological group membership. That is, people are explicitly or implicitly mak
8.
by 38kkdiu 10y ago
Yeah, being in my 40s and looking at that, my immediate thought was "oh, it seems I'm trying to figure out plan Z, even when I had pretty good plans A and B." My advice from the other side is that there's too many unknow