37638894breeze

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by 37638894breeze 3y ago

   The semantically significant bit is "technology" and that is what is tripping up the "mah local model" group. Technology develops as the result of focused application of capital and shaping the evolution of that technolo
2. 2.▲
   by 37638894breeze 3y ago

   I like the "X, [the platform] formerly known as X" its evolution. Latest in the wild sighting was "X, formerly Twitter". What I like about it is that it lifts the skirt on the superficial divides. Good soldiers of the i
3. 3.▲
   by 37638894breeze 3y ago

   You could go the route of having a zoo of many small libraries and just version the library, so mod-x becomes lib_x. That, dependency management, is not a convincing argument for something 'new' called "module". You can
4. 4.▲
   by 37638894breeze 3y ago

   I have to listen to the Joe's talk on this but from OP this is more accurately "Why do we need Erlang modules at all?" or generously "Modules in FP languages". A key motivating pattern (fib/3) is a pattern in F